Accessibility Conformance Testing Teleconference

<scribe> scribe: ToddL

ACT rules sheet and Survey Results

Wilco: No update from Will, Tom asked for reviews

Helen: Writing up PR that has been done.

Open ACT pull requests

Todd can take up review of #1850 PR, waiting to review #1848

Wilco: #1852 Wilco, Tom, and Trevor to review.
... #1835 has 3 approvals already, Tom needs to request new reviews.

Helen: Sent email out for #1778, will be merged next week.

#1778 is part of #1833 PR.

Daniel: Can close #1802

Update from ACT implementations on WAI website

<Wilco> https://deploy-preview-103--wai-wcag-act-rules.netlify.app/standards-guidelines/act/rules/

Wilco: Some grammatical changes and waiting for review from Shawn Henry. Will ask AG to review as well.
... Did anyone in group find anything for feedback or things that cannot go to AG
... More work in editorial things to be done.

Helen: Will take a look at this

dmontalvo: Will provide comments and feedback

+1

<trevor> +1

<Helen> +1

<kathy> +1

RESOLUTION: Agree with the direction of the updated ACT pages

<Wilco> https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act-rules/pull/104

<Wilco> https://deploy-preview-104--wai-wcag-act-rules.netlify.app/standards-guidelines/act/rules/

RESOLUTION: Accept PR #104, pending agreement between Wilco & Daniel

iframe with negative tabindex has no interactive elements (akn7bn)

Survey will be rejected

Wilco: Need to address issue #1843

role attribute has valid value (674b10)

Wilco: Tom emailed Wilco and thinks if it is split in two, focusable to 4.1.2 and non-focusable to 1.3.1

Helen: Good idea to split them into two rules.

kathy: Makes sense to separate them.

Wilco: Another option is to not map to WCAG at all.

trevor: Likes option to not map to WCAG

Wilco: Can make this ARIA rule and it would be more consistent.

<Wilco> Poll: 1. Keep the rule as is, 2. split between 1.3.1 and 4.1.2 on focusable or not, 3. Do not map to WCAG 2 at all

<kathy> 3

<trevor> 3

<Helen> 2

3

<dmontalvo> 3

<Wilco> 3

kathy: would there be implementations if we split into two rules?

Wilco: Implementors will have to update their mapping to WCAG

kathy: 2nd approach more correct

trevor: Is splitting them more correct though?

kathy: Thinks techniques listed are throwing things off.

<kathy> https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Techniques/failures/F42.html

RESOLUTION: Do not map Role attribute valid value to WCAG, only to ARIA