– DRAFT –
(MEETING TITLE)

Proposed: approve last meeting minutes https://www.w3.org/2022/05/10-dxwg-minutes

<riccardoAlbertoni> +1

<Nobu_OGURA> +1

+1

<Pierre-Antoine> +1

<Ana_Duarte__> +0 (was not there)

RESOLUTION: approved last meeting minutes

riccardoAlbertoni: a couple of issues about DCAT

<riccardoAlbertoni> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1502

riccardoAlbertoni: internationalization and security and privacy
… we can submit the checklists to the groups
… some of them expect that we provide a date that we will reply
… I think we don't have a transition date for the candidate recommendation
… last dxwg call we suggested early August to receive feddback and consider end of August for a deadline
… so we must indicate a deadline
… we can move to candidate recommendation in October or November

Caroline_: what about early September?

pchampin: W3C admin staff may also be on vacation on July

riccardoAlbertoni: So it is probably a good plan to consider September

riccardoAlbertoni: the CR is the stage where we start the implementation report
… in the new charter we have 2 years

Caroline_: we have until the end of 2023

proposal: September as a deadline for DXWG review

<riccardoAlbertoni> proposed: September as a deadline for DXWG horizontal reviews

<Pierre-Antoine> +1

<riccardoAlbertoni> +1

+1

<Ana_Duarte__> +1

<Nobu_OGURA> +1

RESOLUTION: September as a deadline for DXWG horizontal reviews

<riccardoAlbertoni> Technical Architecture Group ( TAG)

riccardoAlbertoni: we addressed 3 horizontal reviews until now. Andrea addressed TAG
… There is no checklist and DCAT it is not critical for TAG. Should we contact them now or wait for CR?

<riccardoAlbertoni> https://www.w3.org/Guide/documentreview/

riccardoAlbertoni: regarding TAG we only need to make sure we are on the right track

<Pierre-Antoine> https://tag.w3.org/workmode/

<Pierre-Antoine> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues

Pierre-Antoine: This webpage mentions a repository review
… there is no specifics and it makes sense since TAG is a higher level review
… there is nothing critical about DCAT regarding the principles
… taking inspiration from the existing issues in this repository might help

<riccardoAlbertoni> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/712

riccardoAlbertoni: I think we can use this as a model for DCAT https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/712

Pierre-Antoine: when you create a issue there are three templates. One of them is for the spec review, which is for us

<riccardoAlbertoni> The checklist for TAG is available here https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/new/choose

<Pierre-Antoine> https://tag.w3.org/explainers/

Pierre-Antoine: there are some examples on the link above

riccardoAlbertoni: I will send it to Andrea

riccardoAlbertoni: the last issue
… about the transition to different languages. Currently as editors we can translate to Spanish, Italian and English
… the question we have is that as the translation is not normative, can we translate it after the CR?

Pierre-Antoine: Are we talking about the translation of the document?

riccardoAlbertoni: About the RDF translation

Pierre-Antoine: Is it normative?

riccardoAlbertoni: No it is not

Pierre-Antoine: I will double check, but I think as long it is not normative it can be done later

riccardoAlbertoni: If there is not more comments on the draft we sent, we will send them on the next few days to the horizontal groups

<Caroline_> Agenda: Next Charter

Pierre-Antoine: the AC review is open until this Thursday
… we have 13 supporters
… might be good to reach some ACs and ask them to vote

<Pierre-Antoine> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/dxwg-charter-2022/

Caroline_: I can send an email to the DXWG group asking to answer

Nobu_OGURA: my organization already answered

Results link https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/dxwg-charter-2022/results

meeting adjourned