Meeting minutes
tony: face to face June 9
<wseltzer> https://
tim: please sign up, even if you are remote.
tony: web payments WG tomorrow
<wseltzer> https://
tony: like to close on licensing update
… waiting for David Turner
… do people have to rejoin
wendy: still re-join phase
tony: change it now charter has to include new licensing.
… if we change it now, wnedy, does it have to go to Board approval or back out
Wendy: let me see
tony: not hearing any objections, - to change the copyright license. The new one allows peopel to take different parts of this as needed.
wendy: more premissive
… can make derivative woirks - you can fork the spec
shane: I need alink to the new license.
… need legal to review. I need to bring a license change to my folks
agl: if re-license is recharter, lets wait.
agl: its nice not to have copyright
wendy: tried to clarify in the license, that even the less permissive license permits use of excerpts.
agl: more premissive would be nice to have.
wendy: most working group charting now use the more premissive
… what if we need to take things elsewhere.
Tony: turn to PRs
<wseltzer> Permissive Software and Document License
<wseltzer> nadalin: 1663
<wseltzer> agl: planning to make updates
<wseltzer> nadalin: 1576
<wseltzer> ... non-modal
<wseltzer> nina: we'd like Akshay to take a look
<nsteele> https://
wendy, I am back
tony: jeff hodges, a former editor designation. This is Jeff's decision
https://
Shane: I was in this discussion for approving changes
… there was some objections, asked to submit PR, that is not #1718
… this is the PR
s/that is #1718
bradley: a user verification issue, does not recognize some L2 changes
agl: it does seem an opposite change I would be more in favor
… argument is at creation time
shane: is there a case at registratio, if you set prefer you might now require it
agL: RP many change at the system can learn.
tony: write this up and we can close this one.
shane: we could say this is a reason, but not definitive
tony: some triage
akshay: samething, sometimes you improve fingerprint matching
tony: there is not much support on this
<dwaite> Just a FYI, the Mac platform Secure Enclave exposes a flag to request that a key not be released with any newer enrolled biometrics. https://
TimC: in think there is interest. we get questions about shared credential
s/I think
tony: what do we do
agl: wiht ctap 2 and mobile devices, if you know the pin can...
MMiller: like a management key
nsteele: I will respond and I can close ticket
… if we don't hear anyting
/github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1722//github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1722
… #1721 is the same thing
agl: I can respond to this
https://
timC: haven't made progress
tony: do we want to do this
timC: we should update text
/github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1716//github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/17216
tony: this is getting looks.
MMiller: we had this transport discussion.
tony: Tim will close
<nsteele> Nick will close
<nsteele> Tim2