Meeting minutes
minutes
<Ege> https://
Ege: talked about panel AC presentation
… then about CG charter draft
… we discussed also about PR 309
… we have an update for it today
… minutes looks good, but there's a typo
Kaz: fixed
Ege: minutes approved
Pull requests
Ege: skipping CG charter discussion now since it is going to be long
PR 314
<Ege> PR 314 - refactor: mention and link main wiki/call
<Ege> Issue 308 - Linking to the Main Call Wiki
Ege: daniel fixed issue 308
… looks good to me
… it adds a link to the main call agenda
… any remarks?
… ok then PR merged and issue closed
PR 309
<Ege> PR 309 - Add new tool organization
Ege: a new way to organize tools
… it is better organized
… with icons in a grid layout
… for the future
… I want to add labels next to tool name
McCool: one comment to the look
… hard to read
… the subtitle is better short
… one liner?
… and the long text might be put after the link
dape: I have a similar question
… this page is not consistent to the content of the other pages
… it does not have an intial heading or paragraph
McCool: maybe a simple text introducing the page
Cristiano: I would just give a little bit more of withespace between icons and the list
PR 392
<Ege> PR 392 - [wot] First draft of the CG charter
Ege: I published the CG charter proposal in the right repository
Ege: quite basic charter description
… I reviewed Japanese CG too
… we should focus on goals and scope of work
… open points: dependencies with no w3c group? contribution mechanics
McCool: the first line should be more around community instead of WoT
Ege: I agree
Cristiano: +1
McCool: then we can talk about the activities
Kaz: quick comment
… it depends on the policy but it might be easier to concentrate on one specific section and discuss it in one call
Ege: understood
… we can create issues for specific charter in the repository linked above
… also the charter will be reviewed by the community as regulated
… any other remarks?
Cristiano: maybe we can use the issues to talk about the problems that we pinpointed in the document
Ege: yeah for example the chair selection is not clear
McCool: I agree we should choose one mode or the other
… also we should think better about the process
… we need to make sure that it is airtight
… what happens if there are no 5 people? or if there is only people from one organization?
Ege: kaz do you know if can change that part of the charter?
Kaz: it was not meant to be changed but there is room for improvement
<Ege> https://
Kaz: community group is quite large already right?
Ege: yeah yesterday we got a new member
… btw I'm also opening a new issue about contribution mechanics
Cristiano: maybe the contribution section should contain more informative text about how people can operate within the group
Ege: I think this is going to be the first issue of our own group
Cristiano: yeah just remember that to update the charter we should follow a long process...
… on the other hand, I agree with you that is too early to decide how people can contribute
issues
Ege: we have three issues open about collaboration with the CG
Cristiano: I think we can move the discussion to the charter document
Kaz: the charter is important but you should clarify first your expectation as chairs
<Mizushima> +1 kaz
Kaz: then write the charter
… have you talked with Ian Jacobs for the repository ?
Ege: not yet but I will
<Ege> https://
Ege: what the name should be?
Cristiano: +1 looks good
<Ege> https://
<Ege> https://
https://
issue 305
<Ege> https://
Ege: we should target these conferences
… who is going to present? and what?
… I was thinking about discovery
Cristiano: seems a good idea
Ege: aob ?
… ok meeting adjourned
<kaz> [adjourned]