– DRAFT –
Silver Reliability

<dmontalvo> Tweaks to the method document

Review of Method

<dmontalvo> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MjmGLfmqcfLgauqg0C3dRZG6KYT2dy5BQ69sz4xet6Q/edit#heading=h.suhwld62yx1t

We accepted a wording change from Danial to change "rule" to "method" to make it consistent.

<dmontalvo> Tweaks to the method document//

We discussesd changing the name of the Glossary tab
… after some discussion, we settled on "Definitions for implementers"

We added two sentences to explain we are not using plain language in the definitions. "This section does not use plain language for non-technical users. The technical descriptions are precise language primarily for test tool developers."

Review of the Outcome: Pronunciation of Text

Outcome: Procunciation of Text <- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-c96lQsQq1jgdDKo4C9GaWEj7cVoxDdCvtLPvqCOBBE/edit#

In the first paragraph, we agreed to change guideline 3.1 to success criterion 3.1.2 Language of Parts because we are not covering the entire guideline

We agreed to remove the draft of the Method from the Outcome document since everything was moved to the Method. We saved a version in History ofl the google doc in case it is ever needed

Review and Comparison with Writing Testable WCAG 3.0 Outcomes

Review and Comparison with Writing Testable WCAG 3.0 Outcomes <- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sugAtqie_x1XqHDZo1Im7ftDNllWeRV_ty4PULeoTV0/

Step 4, item 5: We discussed a comment by Jon Avila "Automation should not trump user need though unless it's not readily achievable in a manual way." We changed the entire paragraph to include Jon's comment.

JS: We haven't done the How-To. Should we start this?

HOw To Template <- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Smly4XDxfzfXHa7AoUxoLXLy_3PdOXMkh0ZwtgksSPk/

DM: We should update the Testable Outcomes document to put the template at the bottom