W3C

– DRAFT –
DXWG Plenary

26 April 2022

Attendees

Present
AndreaPerego, annette_g, DaveBrowning, Nobu_OGURA, plh, PWinstanley, riccardoAlbertoni
Regrets
antoine
Chair
PWinstanley
Scribe
annette_g, plh

Meeting minutes

<PWinstanley> proposed: approve https://www.w3.org/2022/04/12-dxwg-minutes

Previous minutes

0

<PWinstanley> +1

<riccardoAlbertoni> +1

<AndreaPerego> +1

RESOLUTION: approve https://www.w3.org/2022/04/12-dxwg-minutes

<annette_g> +1

RESOLUTION: https://www.w3.org/2022/04/12-dxwg-minutes approved

DACT Updates - report

https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/99375/dcat_2022_v3/

PWinstanley: unanimity to publish

<PWinstanley> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/99375/dcat_2022_v3/results shows 8 in favour, 0 against

+1

<annette_g> proposed: accept the result of the poll

<DaveBrowning> +1

<AndreaPerego> +1

<riccardoAlbertoni> +1

<annette_g> +1

<PWinstanley> proposed: accept poll result in favour of publication of DCAT v3

<annette_g> +1

<PWinstanley> +1

<AndreaPerego> +1

<riccardoAlbertoni> +1

RESOLUTION: accept poll result in favour of publication of DCAT v3

ACTION: Plh to publish the PWD of DCAT 3

Plh: I'll do the magic to get it done
… then we need to do the wide review: https://www.w3.org/Guide/documentreview/

PWinstanley: a11y folks tend to talk to us a bit more

<annette_g> plh: we have 5 horizontal groups

<annette_g> they all have github repos where we need to open an issue.

<annette_g> Before we get to them, all have a questionnaire that we need to answer.

https://github.com/w3c/baggage/issues/93

<annette_g> Tracking all of that through github issues is the way to go.

<annette_g> that ^ is an example

https://github.com/w3c/baggage/issues/91

<annette_g> This one is pretty easy. Once we're ready for the horizontal review, we point them to our completed questionnaire.

<annette_g> We need the working draft, and we need to send it to all of them.

<annette_g> We should reach out to all the groups we know about.

<annette_g> Each questionnaire is 20-30 questions, might take 2 weeks.

<annette_g> The one that would take the most effort might be security and privacy.

<annette_g> At the next plenary, we can look at all the issues with the questionnaires. We should expect to wait 3 months to hear back.

<annette_g> That puts the earlier time for CR in August.

<annette_g> riccardoAlbertoni: the CR could be later, right?

<annette_g> plh: yes

<annette_g> PWinstanley: maybe by Oct/Nov we'll be done with version 3.

<annette_g> plh: we need to list the changes too

<annette_g> PWinstanley: is there anything else we need to note at this point?

<annette_g> riccardoAlbertoni: I noticed that plh attached one questionnaire. Are there others we need to consider?

https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1502

<annette_g> plh: yes, they are linked from the document review.

<annette_g> ... I opened this issue to track.

<annette_g> PWinstanley reviews who will do what

<annette_g> We really want to make sure we get comments, not just critical ones.

<annette_g> ... nulls are not allowed.

<annette_g> PWinstanley: next question is do we need a plenary in a couple weeks, or wait a month?

https://www.w3.org/2020/02/dx-wg-charter.html#coordination

<annette_g> plh: If we aren't ready with the questionnaires, no need to.

<annette_g> ... we need to determine what is the relevant subset here.

<annette_g> ... (of people to ping)

<annette_g> ... we probably should reach out to schema.org

<annette_g> PWinstanley: co-data too

<annette_g> plh:putting them into the issue

<annette_g> PWinstanley: goFAIR, RDA...

<annette_g> PWinstanley: next plenary meeting, do we play it by ear?

<annette_g> people nod

<annette_g> Nobu joins us, pwin reviews discussion thus far

PWinstanley: lots of people will be on vacation during the summer. If people feel there is a need to meet, we'll do that.
… If not, we'll cancel.

Nobu_OGURA: what is the timeline?

PWinstanley: probably about a month, right?

plh: 3 months for horizontal review

PWinstanley: for publication of the working draft with changes to address feedback, it would be about a month.
… would that work?

plh: yes

PWinstanley: there are W3C news releases.

plh: because it's going to be a working draft, it won't make the home page of the consortium. We can broadcast a bit more because it is "wide review". You can do a blog.

PWinstanley: That's what I've done in the past. will do that again.

<plh> https://www.w3.org/blog/

link to wordpress blog ^

plh: Are we going to talk about the next charter?

Next charter updates

PWinstanley: give us the news

plh: I've got approval to move ahead with it!
… We'll extend the current group, start the wide review, all within the week

PWinstanley: motion to adjourn?
… done

Summary of action items

  1. Plh to publish the PWD of DCAT 3

Summary of resolutions

  1. approve https://www.w3.org/2022/04/12-dxwg-minutes
  2. https://www.w3.org/2022/04/12-dxwg-minutes approved
  3. accept poll result in favour of publication of DCAT v3
Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by scribe.perl version 185 (Thu Dec 2 18:51:55 2021 UTC).

Diagnostics

Succeeded: s/We'll extend the current group/... We'll extend the current group/

Succeeded: s/we have 5 horizontal groups/plh: we have 5 horizontal groups/

Succeeded: s/Peter: unanimity to publish/PWinstanley: unanimity to publish/

Succeeded: s/Peter: a11y folks tend to talk to us a bit more/PWinstanley: a11y folks tend to talk to us a bit more/