Meeting minutes
Minutes
Lagally: (goes through the minutes)
approved
Lagally: (goes through the minutes)
Publication
Lagally: updated Note has been published
… wondering about the editorial changes for publication
Kaz: still need to create a PR to apply them to the main branch
Lagally: (goes through the published version)
Kaz: note that the latest template doesn't have the "Previous version" link
… but has "History" link instead
… to see all the previous version docs at once
Lagally: ok
… have you sent out an announcement to the group lists?
Kaz: yes
Lagally: wondering about the next step
… do we want to get dormant for a while?
… or continue the discussion?
… don't have an immediate answer myself at the moment
Kaz: there was discussion about sync/async actions and cancellation of actions during the Scripting call yesterday
… and I strongly suggested we as the WoT WG as a whole should clarify concrete use cases and scenarios for that purpose before starting separate discussion within each TF (TD, Scripting, Architecture, etc.)
Lagally: completely agree
… note that the use case template has sections on security and privacy as well as the basic description
… how should we proceed?
… should create some table?
… currently, we list all the use cases based on the roles
… for example, we can create a separate MD to clarify the coverage of the use cases by the specs
Kaz: maybe we should see the coverage of the requirements too
Lagally: yeah
… but would start with use cases first
… (tries to generate a table to describe the coverage of the use cases and requirements)
… Use Cases, Architecture, Thing Description, Profile, Discovery, Scripting API, Binding Templates
… then Requirement reference
MD explaining the coverage of use cases
Lagally: the question is how to check all the use cases
… (copies all the use case sections from the Use Cases Note to the CSV file)
… would like to present this CSV file during the main call tomorrow
Next steps
Lagally: how to deal with the Use Cases calls?
Kaz: it depends on the proposed use cases
… given ECHONET, OPC UA, Takenaka, etc., are getting more and more interested in WoT, I think there is a possibility we'll get some more advanced use cases
Lagally: ok
Kaz: we should have further discussion during the main call, the Editors call and the Chairs call
Lagally: if ECHONET, etc., are willing to provide their new use cases, please let me know
Kaz: ok
[adjourned]