Meeting minutes
<riccardoAlbertoni> PROPOSED: approve last meeting minutes https://
<riccardoAlbertoni> +1
+1
<AndreaPerego> 0 (was not there)
RESOLUTION: approve last meeting minutes https://
riccardoAlbertoni: Discussions on paper with Alejandra, and with potential journal
<AndreaPerego> No objections.
riccardoAlbertoni: They didn't seem appropriate. Another suggestion has been made - want to check that other editors are okay with this approach
Status of DCAT3 3PWD
No objections raise
riccardoAlbertoni: We need a plan for the next month - intend a fourth public draft.
<riccardoAlbertoni> https://
riccardoAlbertoni: Is this agreed, and can we produce a schedule?
… This schedule implies a public draft by mid February
<riccardoAlbertoni> https://
riccardoAlbertoni: This plan moves the CR to mid June
<riccardoAlbertoni> https://
riccardoAlbertoni: and this one to end July
DaveBrowning: I will be moving in June/July - may be difficult to provide effort from mid June onwards
riccardoAlbertoni: I will be very busy too
<riccardoAlbertoni> Monday, February 28 2022
riccardoAlbertoni: we could aim for end Feb for 4 PWD. Then CR at beginnong of June
AndreaPerego: We probably have to have a 4th PWD. But doing it in Feb means we won't be adding much.
… Only thing to be checked is that the plenary are happy
riccardoAlbertoni: Little complaint on versioning, but data series is still quite active discussion
… most feedback was late but manageable - but we do need to include/respond
AndreaPerego: Think what we have added works
… Discussion isn't a surprise - its a response to the features in DCAT 1.
… If its enough for 4 PWD to have versioning and series then its possible
riccardoAlbertoni: Are editors available
AndreaPerego: I should be generally
DaveBrowning: I can contribute some time
AndreaPerego: End February means just one meeting before then
… Could we use the plenary for this?
riccardoAlbertoni: Best way to handle plenary would be to make a practical suggestion
… Next plenary is likely to be focussed on charter
riccardoAlbertoni: If end Feb isn't acceptable the we would have to delay the CR to after the summer
<riccardoAlbertoni> https://
Open issues
riccardoAlbertoni: I'll make sure scheduling is covered in plenary
riccardoAlbertoni: Long discussion in thread - suggest we drop accessURL from example
AndreaPerego: Agree with the suggestion. Discussion is quite complicated, and quite some time ago
… Example needs to help explain, while the usage may reflect DCAT 2014 practice it isn't really ideal now
action on riccardoAlbertoni to put together a PR
<trackbot> Sorry, but no Tracker is associated with this channel.
<riccardoAlbertoni> https://
next issue
riccardoAlbertoni: Perhaps just replace tar with zip
AndreaPerego: Good idea
… there isn't a good global code list. But talking to IANA isn't in our remit
<riccardoAlbertoni> https://
riccardoAlbertoni: Haven't had time to look at this in detail, but not sure what the problem really is
AndreaPerego: Needs a closer look
riccardoAlbertoni: We need to make sure that the plenary is happy about how we handle issues that we can't respond to in the recommendation
… We have responded to many but still more to do
AndreaPerego: Not sure how much effort/time it will need and we have limited resources
… we also have limited feedback from the wider community.
… dataservices do need to be addressed but can't be done by February
… Unless we try to produce a roadmap
riccardoAlbertoni: Perhaps some effort in parallel to the CR process....
AndreaPerego: We can suggest it.
AndreaPerego: Perhaps we can make some time for Nobu to provide his perspective in the next meeting
… We're also keen to explain what we did with DCAT 2 & 3
Nobu_OGURA: Appreciate the offer of help