Meeting minutes
1. Update on Server Conformance Tests and COLRv1 IFT Demo
<Vlad> Quick demo of COLRv1 Emoji IFT test
https://
<chris> wfm on Canary 98
<Vlad> Updates on server test, see https://
vlad: couple of new issues in the last few weeks
vlad: let's go through the list
IFT open issues https://github.com/w3c/IFT/issues
vlad: first one (#43) single origin restriction. already good discussion there. Should we accept suggestion to make a note.
Chris: yes
Chris: I'll edit the spec
Vlad: next is fingerprinting analysis #42
Vlad: question about using font for fingerprinting, I though fonts that are dynamically loaded can't be used. Only installed ones
Chris: yeah
Myles: one thing that ios/macos does is does not expose information about user installed fonts to the web. That effectively solves this problem.
Vlad: don't see this as a relevant issue to incxfer.
Vlad: data points are not available outside of the origin.
Chris: I can follow up on the issue.
Vlad: next issue 41.
Garret: responded explaining we don't want to specify subsetter behaviour.
Vlad: issue also touches the codepoint vs glyph in the evaluation.
Garret: my response also touches on this explaining the evaluation was done with both glyphs (range request) and codepoints (patch subset)
Vlad: so think we still need to have a statement in the spec that explains what glyph coverage issues a subsetter needs to be aware of (eg. stylistic sets, layout rules, glyph variants)
Garret: ok that can be added, would like to do it as an informative section, and keep the equivalence requirement as the normative requirement enforcing that.
Garret: I'll take this on
Myles: planning on posting the range request draft today.
Vlad: update not related to incxfer, small change in woff2 corrections.
Vlad: one was backtracked from candidate correction to editorial.
Chris: I was over cautious, but was told review not need and to back it off.
Vlad: let's target dec. 7th for the next call.
Garret: sounds good.