W3C

– DRAFT –
(MEETING TITLE)

16 November 2021

Attendees

Present
bryan, carmacleod, howard, jamesn, jongund, MarkMcCarthy, Matt_King, Rich_Noah, siri
Regrets
sarahigley
Chair
Jemma
Scribe
Jemma

Meeting minutes

ARIA APG 1.2 retrospective

<Rich_Noah> Howard present+

https://raw.githack.com/w3c/aria-practices/apg-1.2r1/aria-practices.html

URL to preview the publication and as permanent record of the state of the pub branch for the CFC:

APG Redesign Project

https://github.com/w3c/apg-redesign/issues

https://github.com/w3c/apg-redesign/issues/1

this will be the last versioning for APG. redesign project will be new platform for APG document

Prototype: http://wai-aria-practices.s3-website-us-east-1.amazonaws.com/

jon: will aria apg 1.1 be deprecated?

mck: old version will get deprecation warning

Jemma will contact michael to place deprecation warning to 1.1

mck: still work to be done with education and outreach working group.

for apg redesign project
… we can aim for axecon as the deadline, fall back can be GAAD

"This publication is expected to be the final publication of WAI-ARIA Authoring Practices 1.2 as a Working Group Note. The content will continue to be updated as a resource outside of the formal document stream. To see plans for the complete guide, review the Authoring Practices Milestone Plan."

https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/milestones?direction=asc&sort=due_date&state=open

https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/milestone/11

mck: we may need to rethink about milestone concept since we are not doing any versioning

james: we will work something out how to versioning the doc.

james: everything except ARIA will be ever green doc.

mck: we also add html exmaples - ex: slider with input and a lot more coming to incorporate to new design
… more cohesive doc for accessibility
… we will continue to work on slider, rating, accordion changes

jon: completing navigation menu guidance will be great.
… u of i campus developers are asking about this example

car: i am also wondering about navigation menu guidnace.

mck: we are getting cloes to finish.

car:

i like the intro section of menu bar and hope it can be part of spec

https://raw.githack.com/w3c/aria-practices/apg-1.2r1/examples/disclosure/disclosure-navigation.html

https://raw.githack.com/w3c/aria-practices/apg-1.2r1/aria-practices.html#disclosure

https://raw.githack.com/w3c/aria-practices/apg-1.2r1/examples/menubar/menubar-navigation.html

https://raw.githack.com/w3c/aria-practices/apg-1.2r1/examples/disclosure/disclosure-navigation-hybrid.html

jon: Example Disclosure Navigation Menu with Top-Level Links and Disclosure (Show/Hide) Navigation Menu can be very helpful

jon: mat and bryan, what do you think about separation link from button in top level links example?

mak/bryan: it is a good thing to separate link from button

jon: I am seeing the hybrid approach.

mck: that is aweful because it forces user to go through so many links

jon: shift tab moves the focus to top level link.
… links should be visible or hidden?

mck: there should be no links hidden from screen reader users.

brayn: there is different example in accordion case. but we suggest separate button to trigger visbility.

of hidden links

jon: display none for submenu items.

mck/bryan: that is ok.

james: are we planning to create web co? mpoent examples to apg

?

mck/james: we can offer vanila version of js and web component but people may abuse those without learning.

mck: we need to make sure that this is not production library.

people would use without learning

car: we need to provide guidances.

mck: we did a lot of work and improved on quality control and infrastructure.
… wondering about outcome

jon: it was worth to see all the updates and upgrade.
… adding accessibility features was good.

<carmacleod> car: we need to provide guidance for responsive design. i.e. how should things like tab component behave on smaller screens? Dropdown?

jon: comparing old example with new example shows that there are so much work to be done.

mck: we can organize project board to prioritize

rich: I see several different project boards.

mck: there is two types project boards -one is based on example pattern and compile all related issues.
… shows the bird view of a specific pattern
… the other is about code quality tracker project board.

it is more about auditing the examples

rich: showing the progress will be benficial.

car: question about region and section role discussion
… if we have div with region without accessible name, is it landmark or not?

mck: yes. it is landmark

james: region required to have accessible name.

form "role" will require accessible name, not form elemement.

car: banner in scope of body with role ban, it is landmark.

Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by scribe.perl version 159 (Fri Nov 5 17:37:14 2021 UTC).

Diagnostics

Succeeded: s/rich; showing/rich: showing

Maybe present: brayn, car, james, jon, mak/bryan, mck, mck/bryan, mck/james, Prototype, rich