<scribe> scribe: CarlosD
Wilco: no call for reviews
open
... there's a couple of things approved that haven't been put
on call for review yet
<Wilco> https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/issues/assigned/WilcoFiers
Wilco: spending more time on
migration stuff
... been working on an updated definition of
implementations
CarlosD: we need to get implementors on a call
Wilco: might be worth it to set up a different meeting for that
https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/issues/assigned/carlosapaduarte
<dmontalvo> Carlos: Trying to get some reviews, there is one issue that Kathy and you reminded me about
https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/pull/1444
<dmontalvo> Have a look at the definition of focus, elements that are not on screen should not be focusable
Helen: Word done, but someone should check the github issue
https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/pull/1444
Wilco: the TF is working on an
update to the ACT rules format
... it is a new section that defines different aspects of
implementations
... we are missing the people I would like to discuss this
with
... we should do an explicit invite to implementers for the
next meeting to discuss this and Kristian's proposal
CarlosD: I will do that
dmontalvo: we're ready to publish
the first phase of the new redesign
... table of contents is included but still missing the
descriptions
... ready to publish the new pages of WCAG rules when
everything else is published
Wilco: the definition of valid
language tag led to some confusion
... some questions came up why we're saying "valid language"
when we don't require the language to be valid according to
BCP-47
... any suggestions on what we might name this instead?
<Wilco> https://act-rules.github.io/glossary/#valid-language-tag
Helen: Recognizable language tag?
CarlosD: that sounds good, it conveys the existing tag in the registry
Wilco: we could just use
"language tag"
... "know language tag"?
dmontalvo: what we want to convey is that there is a predefined set of tags, and you can't use whatever you wish
Helen: "set language tag"?
Wilco: I'm inclined to use "know language tag"
dmontalvo: agree
CarlosD: agree
Wilco: but "de-hello" is not
know, but it meets our definition
... so we should include "primary
... so we should include "primary"
... it becomes "Know primary language tag"
Wilco: do we want this to apply
to inheriting links, that is, DPUB roles that inherit from
links?
... in axe, when we find something with the doc-biblioref role
we require it to be an anchor element
... but this is in fact a question if we do want to support
DPUB
CarlosD: we have passed example 2
in role attribute has valid value
... this requires supporting DPUB
Wilco: so if we are already requiring it, it should be okay to make the change in this rule also
Wilco: the Internationalization
Working group proposed a glossary
... it might use some definitions that we use
... searching it we found "valid language tag" but we are
addressing it with the updated definition
This is scribe.perl Revision VERSION of 2020-12-31 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/theres/there's/ Succeeded: s/it, we it/it, it/ Succeeded: s/wit/with/ Default Present: Helen, CarlosD, Daniel, Wilco Present: Helen, CarlosD, Daniel, Wilco Found Scribe: CarlosD Inferring ScribeNick: CarlosD WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth WARNING: No date found! Assuming today. (Hint: Specify the W3C IRC log URL, and the date will be determined from that.) Or specify the date like this: <dbooth> Date: 12 Sep 2002 People with action items: WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]