<scribe> scribe: trevor
wilco: cfc last week, no rejections
RESOLUTION: Accept Autocomplete and Decorative not exposed rules
<Wilco> https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/521/files#r733577400
<Wilco> Rules can only operate on the Language aspect if the language of a page can be determined. The means by which the language is assessed, whether by a person or a machine, is not of importance as long as the assessment meets the criteria defined in [[wcag2-tech-req#humantestable]] [[WCAG]].
<Wilco> Some rules can only operate on a Language aspect if the language is sufficiently understood, while other rules only require identifying the language. For example, a rule checking that an accessible name is descriptive can only function if the language is understood. A rule checking the correctness of a `lang` attribute requires knowing what language is used, but not the meaning of the words.
wilco: Have been some back and forth and updates. Think its better now.
<Wilco> https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/521/files#r733577400
wilco: Going to put this into a CFC
<Wilco> https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/522/
wilco: We are adding an optional
implementation section to the rule and gives a format
... update to the act rules format. Most interesting pieces are
consistency and coverage
<Wilco> https://act-rules.github.io/rules/ff89c9#implementation-metrics
wilco: complete if nothing is untested. could be consistent if all are untested.
trevor: question about the minimal conditions for inapplicable cases.
wilco: can't just say cantTell for everything since then its doing nothing
trevor: flip numerator and
denominator
... question about data for automated coverage.
wilco: Have people give a default for their tool. Not separating semi-automated from manual, hard to define semi.
trevor: question on semi automated tools that have specific implementations for ACT rules.
wilco: Could just have a tool designed to pass ACT rules, hard to differentiate.
<Wilco> https://act-rules.github.io/rules/ff89c9#implementation-metrics
wilco: Added bit about passed example satisfying rules accessibility requirements and similar (but opposite) for failed cases.
<KarenHerr> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1OSkPFocXk4K3zYLnwS78WLsWO4PvE5yRcsauyefuIUI/edit#gid=0
trevor: line height rule is a bit messy, dealing with multiple elements, possibly styling changes within a block of text
wilco: Could have pseudo elements changing like one letter which could affect things
trevor: May need to add an assumption for consistent styling in an element
wilco: Added a checking column for us to re-review some of the rules.
wilco: a few small typos and small additions from Daniel
karen: question about putting link into background section
wilco: thought we were going to
put it on a separate rule
... may have been put on the wrong rule.
... Wanted to cross link between presentational children rule
and aria-hidden has no focusable content rule
wilco: element with lang
attribute has valid language tag, daniel has a small change.
need to get grand fathered tags change in
... then we will be ready to go.