Meeting minutes
tony: no meeting on the 20th
tony: we do have a joint session for TPAC
… oct. 27 is meeting with web payments
wendy: go to TPAC site and register.
<wseltzer> https://
<nsteele> !!!
tony: where are we with the charter. We have support and formal objection
wendy: the formal objection is similar to those the same member has filed on other charters
… Team is asking TAG and Advisory Board as Council to help Director address objections
talked to...
John: when is the meeting to deal with objections?
wendy: no precise timeline for dealing with objections, but should get through before group's charter expires end of year
<wseltzer> https://
agl: is there something to address in this working group
wendy: I put a link on IRC
wendy: we'll work to address so the group isn't held up.
agl: we can continue to work
… maybe we order some things.
wendy: seems reasonable.
tony: is there a response from Addison?
wendy: I can't find him online right now
tony: PRs
https://
tony: mostly I see agreement
jeffH: it is converging - not quite ready
jeffH: I will make last comment in PR and we can go from there
elundberg: yes.
https://
https://
still in progress.
https://
jeffH: in progress
tony: will we hit for Level 3
tony: untriaged
… issues
https://
shane: this came out of FIDO talk on accessibiliyt
jbradley: consumer deployment group at FIDO, doing accessibility review, web authn group has already been working on this
… question to this working group, do we want to do something about authenticator has accessible modalities.
… they would like to turn off some of the alternatives, but still waiting for clarity for ADA
agl: this is browser UI and not an issue, all UI goes those accessibility
… we want authenticators that can meet the needs of users.
jbradley: W3C takes a user angle on accessibility and accept Web Auth.
nsteele: implementation comes down to vendors.
jbradley: other question: form filling for pins
jbradley: by design form fillers can not do that
… answer to this is it is up to browsers
agl: yes. I am happy to have a dialog
… we test screen reader and should work with chrome UI
… I will craft an answer to this issue.
https://
tony: akshay is not on, skip
<dveditz> I apparently can't unmute, but Mozilla also has extensive accessibility testing for our dialogs and other browser UI
tony: list of open issues. are there ones we want to discuss
agl: I think in theory, our error behavior will match Microsoft #1637
tony: any other discussion items?
<wseltzer> [next regular meeting in 4 weeks]
<wseltzer> [adjourned]