W3C

– DRAFT –
DPVCG Meeting Call

14 JUL 2021

Attendees

Present
beatrizE, Georg, harsh, nishadT, paulR, ranaS, stephenT
Regrets
davidH
Chair
harsh
Scribe
harsh

Meeting minutes

Consensus on last week's resolution regarding data transfers

for minutes, as always, see here: https://www.w3.org/community/dpvcg/wiki/Meeting_Calls

last week's session minutes: https://www.w3.org/2021/07/07-dpvcg-minutes.html

no additional comments; we add concepts to the proposed list

Expanding Purpose taxonomy

see https://github.com/w3c/dpv/issues/22

Proposals for sources of purposes from DPA ROPAs (BE, UK), EDPB, CCPA

paulR presenting (shared screen)

paulR: GDPR and EDPB specify that purpose must have details and granularity to make it specific and fit the requirements

paulR: Belgian ROPA has 65 terms for purpose types

paulR: how do we specify these concepts, used in real world, with the ones in purpose category in DPV?

beatrizE: typo in image - LegalObligation is specified instead of LegalCompliance

harsh: any added concept has to fit in the top-down approach and it must have additional abstract concepts added if needed

We need use-cases to apply these and find a) applicability and b) gaps/improvements

Georg: projects about privacy policies that extract metadata e.g. UsablePrivacy

harsh: contacted them; no response; also they work on USA based concepts and don't have several GDPR-required concepts

Georg: good source for EU specific concepts could be recruiter (privacy) policies

Georg: has it been proposed for specifying which data categories are optional and which are mandatory?

(no it has not been proposed so far)

Georg will propose

harsh: are these only limited to data categories; or we can associate them with purpose or even processing? (yes this is possible; so more thinking needed)

Next Meeting

in 2 weeks; WED AUG-28 13:00WEST / 14:00CEST

Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by scribe.perl version 136 (Thu May 27 13:50:24 2021 UTC).