IRC log of aria-apg on 2021-06-22
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 17:44:44 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #aria-apg
- 17:44:44 [RRSAgent]
- logging to https://www.w3.org/2021/06/22-aria-apg-irc
- 17:45:20 [Matt_King]
- MEETING: ARIA Authoring Practices Task Force
- 17:45:26 [Matt_King]
- present+
- 17:45:32 [Matt_King]
- rrsagent, make log public
- 17:45:40 [Matt_King]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 17:45:40 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/06/22-aria-apg-minutes.html Matt_King
- 17:52:20 [Jemma]
- present+
- 17:57:38 [isaacdurazo]
- isaacdurazo has joined #aria-apg
- 17:58:16 [Jemma]
- agenda+ setup and review agenda
- 17:58:47 [Jemma]
- agenda+ html range slider example
- 17:59:09 [Jemma]
- agenda+ jump-to short key
- 17:59:21 [Jemma]
- s/short key/shortcut key
- 17:59:23 [Matt_King]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 17:59:23 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/06/22-aria-apg-minutes.html Matt_King
- 17:59:44 [Jemma]
- agenda+ review of accordion widget
- 17:59:52 [Jemma]
- agenda+ rating radios
- 18:00:08 [jongund]
- jongund has joined #aria-apg
- 18:00:14 [Jemma]
- agenda+ tree example: aria-selected
- 18:00:29 [Jemma]
- agenda+ tooltip design draft
- 18:00:58 [Matt_King]
- shair: Jemma
- 18:01:13 [Matt_King]
- CHAIR: Jemma
- 18:03:23 [Matt_King]
- scribe: matt_king
- 18:04:30 [Jemma]
- s/fix/fixed
- 18:04:48 [Jemma]
- s/fix/fixed/
- 18:05:10 [Rich_Noah]
- Rich_Noah has joined #aria-apg
- 18:05:33 [MarkMcCarthy]
- MarkMcCarthy has joined #aria-apg
- 18:05:38 [MarkMcCarthy]
- present+
- 18:06:14 [isaacdurazo]
- present+
- 18:06:28 [Rich_Noah]
- present+
- 18:08:33 [Jemma]
- zakim, next item
- 18:08:33 [Zakim]
- agendum 1 -- setup and review agenda -- taken up [from Jemma]
- 18:09:36 [siri]
- siri has joined #aria-apg
- 18:09:57 [Jemma]
- no meeting on the first two weeks of July?
- 18:12:21 [CurtBellew]
- CurtBellew has joined #aria-apg
- 18:12:32 [CurtBellew]
- present+
- 18:12:43 [Matt_King]
- No meeting july 6
- 18:12:54 [Matt_King]
- Discussion of July 13
- 18:13:18 [Matt_King]
- Jon: probably should not take 2 weeks off in a row; last work in backlog.
- 18:14:07 [Matt_King]
- Update on redesign project.
- 18:14:19 [Matt_King]
- Isaac: still welcoming feedback on wireframes.
- 18:14:38 [Matt_King]
- this week started how to use template provided by E&O WG.
- 18:14:57 [Matt_King]
- Working on how to fit current content into that template.
- 18:15:12 [Matt_King]
- The current wireframe proposal is early rough draft.
- 18:15:30 [Matt_King]
- Remember that this is going to be iterative.
- 18:17:02 [Matt_King]
- mk: where publish content in e&o template?
- 18:17:12 [Matt_King]
- gh-pages?
- 18:17:59 [Matt_King]
- Jes: we could leverage existing netlify
- 18:18:38 [Matt_King]
- zakim, next topic
- 18:18:38 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'next topic', Matt_King
- 18:18:41 [Jemma]
- zakim, next item
- 18:18:41 [Zakim]
- agendum 2 -- html range slider example -- taken up [from Jemma]
- 18:19:01 [isaacdurazo]
- scribe: isaacdurazo
- 18:19:06 [Jemma]
- https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/pull/1757
- 18:19:35 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: not sure if these are resolved issues
- 18:19:42 [Jemma]
- https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/pull/1757#issuecomment-866205957
- 18:19:43 [isaacdurazo]
- jon: just did an update
- 18:19:54 [isaacdurazo]
- jon: think we are good
- 18:19:57 [Jemma]
- "I changed the example to use the change and pointermove events and it is working on iOS and Android."
- 18:20:01 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: ok good. so we are using two events
- 18:20:42 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: so browser does support touch? dragging with touch?
- 18:21:07 [isaacdurazo]
- jongund: it triggers event if you move pointer move event
- 18:21:28 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: ok so it means pointer is moved by VO. Correct?
- 18:21:37 [isaacdurazo]
- jongund: seems to be working, yes
- 18:21:57 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: ok cool. sounds like pretty solid
- 18:22:06 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: whos signed up for reviews?
- 18:22:27 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: gonna do functional review
- 18:22:33 [isaacdurazo]
- with screen readers
- 18:22:58 [isaacdurazo]
- Jemma: you are done?
- 18:23:05 [isaacdurazo]
- siri: think i done but will do it again
- 18:23:22 [isaacdurazo]
- Jemma: ok please check off list
- 18:23:33 [isaacdurazo]
- Jemma: Jes is possible to do code review?
- 18:24:05 [Jemma]
- zakim, next item
- 18:24:05 [Zakim]
- agendum 3 -- jump-to short key -- taken up [from Jemma]
- 18:24:30 [Jemma]
- https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/pull/1923#issuecomment-861760938
- 18:24:50 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: jon made comment on some keyboards.
- 18:24:51 [Jemma]
- "
- 18:24:51 [Jemma]
- Scripting the option+0 key for macOS may cause internationalization issues, since the the keypress for option+0 generates some character other than zero. I account for this special character in the current script, but if someone is not using English keyboard it could generate another character may not not work for them." by Jon
- 18:25:20 [isaacdurazo]
- jongund: it works now in nelgish keyboards but will be fragile. if someone has a different keyboard.
- 18:25:32 [isaacdurazo]
- jongund: something to be aware of. Maybe not a big deal?
- 18:26:09 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: are there any ways to make this more robust? Rich, Jes?
- 18:26:30 [isaacdurazo]
- Rich_Noah: nothing really pups up
- 18:26:53 [isaacdurazo]
- jongund: with key you will get a character.... idk
- 18:27:05 [Jemma]
- s/pups/pops/
- 18:27:17 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: james, do you know any people that might have potential input on this topic?
- 18:27:24 [isaacdurazo]
- jamesn: not off hand
- 18:27:33 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: everybody, is this a concern?
- 18:27:53 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: think we should merge... not sure if we should have an issue?
- 18:27:58 [isaacdurazo]
- Jemma: thinking possible to add a note
- 18:28:04 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: this is part of the design
- 18:28:14 [isaacdurazo]
- jongund: just merge it and see if people notices
- 18:28:21 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: we might run into this again
- 18:28:54 [Jemma]
- agenda?
- 18:28:56 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: isaac and jess this is something to keep in mind
- 18:29:20 [Jemma]
- zakim, next item
- 18:29:20 [Zakim]
- agendum 4 -- review of accordion widget -- taken up [from Jemma]
- 18:29:24 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: ok just wanted to double check on thah concerns and make sure there are no red flags
- 18:29:45 [isaacdurazo]
- Jemma: skipping next meeting agenda
- 18:30:01 [Jemma]
- zakim, next item
- 18:30:01 [Zakim]
- agendum 4 was just opened, Jemma
- 18:30:03 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: yah lets skip it and get time to talk about bryans work on tooltip
- 18:30:27 [Jemma]
- zakim, take up item 4
- 18:30:27 [Zakim]
- agendum 4 -- review of accordion widget -- taken up [from Jemma]
- 18:30:37 [Jemma]
- zakim, take up item 5
- 18:30:37 [Zakim]
- agendum 5 -- rating radios -- taken up [from Jemma]
- 18:30:54 [Jemma]
- https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/pull/1870
- 18:31:17 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: question about multiple radio groups examples
- 18:31:32 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: my concern is we have a radio group example (pizza example)
- 18:31:34 [Jemma]
- rating radio example is https://raw.githack.com/w3c/aria-practices/radio-rating/examples/radio/radio-rating.html
- 18:31:52 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: then we'll also have this other radio group example (rating one)
- 18:32:24 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: this example allows to write about ratings vs ratings sliding and both perform similar but differences and pros and cons
- 18:32:46 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: my question is: idk we need to have a. unch of rating group examples
- 18:32:56 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: question of maybe too many examples
- 18:33:21 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: we should probably cconsider removing the pizza radio group and replacing with ratings rating group
- 18:33:32 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: jon, maybe you have some input on that
- 18:33:49 [isaacdurazo]
- jongund: think original rating group example contrasting aria example and look like radio groups
- 18:33:51 [Jemma]
- https://w3c.github.io/aria-practices/examples/radio/radio.html
- 18:33:58 [Jemma]
- Radio Group Example Using Roving tabindex
- 18:34:00 [isaacdurazo]
- jongund: visually look different
- 18:34:14 [isaacdurazo]
- jongund: useful to have contrast
- 18:34:40 [Jemma]
- https://raw.githack.com/w3c/aria-practices/radio-rating/examples/radio/radio-rating.html
- 18:34:49 [isaacdurazo]
- jongund: i think the two pizzas one look the same but one uses active decendent and the other one...
- 18:34:53 [Jemma]
- we are talking these two examples
- 18:35:02 [isaacdurazo]
- jongund: rating too different
- 18:35:20 [isaacdurazo]
- jongund: people might struggle connecting between pizza example and rating example
- 18:35:29 [isaacdurazo]
- jongund: underneath they are different
- 18:35:39 [isaacdurazo]
- jongund: dont think we hurt anybody if we keep them on
- 18:35:59 [isaacdurazo]
- jongund: simpler pizza example might be easier to look at the code
- 18:36:22 [isaacdurazo]
- Jemma: jon and matt i think i missed third example
- 18:36:40 [isaacdurazo]
- Jemma: so we decide to keep these?
- 18:36:44 [siri]
- +1 Jon
- 18:36:55 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: we'll three radio group examples
- 18:37:02 [isaacdurazo]
- Jemma: ok
- 18:37:07 [Jemma]
- Radio Group Example Using Roving tabindex
- 18:37:07 [Jemma]
- Radio Group Example Using aria-activedescendant
- 18:37:09 [isaacdurazo]
- Jemma: everyone agrees?
- 18:37:23 [Jemma]
- agena?
- 18:37:28 [Jemma]
- agenda?
- 18:37:29 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: lets make sure we have enough people looking at this
- 18:37:50 [Jemma]
- https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/pull/1870
- 18:38:00 [isaacdurazo]
- jongund: I'll test on android and ios
- 18:38:10 [isaacdurazo]
- siri: I'll do windows
- 18:38:20 [isaacdurazo]
- jongund: can do mac os too
- 18:38:33 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: we should also have other people look at it
- 18:38:55 [isaacdurazo]
- siri: oi can do windows and other kind of phone
- 18:39:21 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: I'm really curious about visual design review
- 18:40:52 [isaacdurazo]
- Jemma: we might need to recruit people for visual design review
- 18:41:33 [isaacdurazo]
- Jemma: please if anyone can recommend reviewers it would be appreciated
- 18:41:45 [Jemma]
- zakim, next item
- 18:41:45 [Zakim]
- agendum 4 -- review of accordion widget -- taken up [from Jemma]
- 18:42:08 [MarkMcCarthy]
- zakim, close item 4
- 18:42:08 [Zakim]
- agendum 4, review of accordion widget, closed
- 18:42:09 [Zakim]
- I see 2 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 18:42:09 [Zakim]
- 6. tree example: aria-selected [from Jemma]
- 18:42:14 [MarkMcCarthy]
- zakim, take up item 6
- 18:42:14 [Zakim]
- agendum 6 -- tree example: aria-selected -- taken up [from Jemma]
- 18:42:53 [Jemma]
- https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/issues/1680
- 18:43:07 [Jemma]
- https://github.com/w3c/aria-practices/pull/1869
- 18:43:39 [Jemma]
- The ARIA 1.1 spec for treeitem requires aria-selected https://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria-1.1/#treeitem.
- 18:43:52 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: question about the issue more than PR. It says ARIA selected is required... wondering if people agree with the ARIA spec is requiring
- 18:44:36 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: tree example work without ARIA selecting but not performing an action
- 18:44:40 [isaacdurazo]
- dont think we want to use selected
- 18:44:44 [isaacdurazo]
- because we use current
- 18:44:57 [isaacdurazo]
- MarkMcCarthy: if spec says we need to use selected... maybe we have a spec issue?
- 18:45:04 [isaacdurazo]
- Jemma: James any comments about this?
- 18:45:17 [isaacdurazo]
- jamesn: gonna have to research the issue and take a look
- 18:45:23 [isaacdurazo]
- Jemma: would you leave a comment on the issue?
- 18:45:46 [isaacdurazo]
- jamesn: how do you find that info?
- 18:45:52 [isaacdurazo]
- jamesn: just lookng at the spec
- 18:46:15 [isaacdurazo]
- jamesn: so also looking at latest editor draft?
- 18:46:17 [isaacdurazo]
- jamesn: yes
- 18:46:32 [MarkMcCarthy]
- s/MarkMcCarthy: if spec says we need to use selected... maybe we have a spec issue?/Matt_King: if spec says we need to use selected... maybe we have a spec issue?
- 18:46:34 [isaacdurazo]
- jamesn: this is the whole aria selected stuff we went through.
- 18:46:50 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: this is a new language
- 18:46:56 [isaacdurazo]
- jongund: aria 1.2 says is required
- 18:47:02 [isaacdurazo]
- jamesn: yah it could be a bug
- 18:47:23 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: this is tricky for me. this will be apg 1.2 to support aria 1.2 spec
- 18:48:10 [isaacdurazo]
- jamesn: in futurte we'll move to non version of apg
- 18:48:16 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: right
- 18:48:29 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: maybe we should add a note to the documentation
- 18:49:03 [isaacdurazo]
- jamesn: what others things take aria seleected?
- 18:49:12 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: we put same language in option as well
- 18:49:19 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: dont remember anywhere else
- 18:49:55 [isaacdurazo]
- jongund: tree item also has
- 18:50:13 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: gonna make a comment to this issue about the change comming to ARIA
- 18:50:56 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: the other tree example, the file tree one. Wondering if that one should be using selected
- 18:51:09 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: we could say is up to the browser to weather or not selected it
- 18:51:17 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: not really suer
- 18:52:04 [isaacdurazo]
- Bryan: i think for a single select dont why would be necesary
- 18:52:17 [isaacdurazo]
- only thing is that as behavioral thing when you have aria selected...
- 18:52:22 [isaacdurazo]
- only then an element becomes exposed
- 18:52:30 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: oh on reading mode?
- 18:52:36 [isaacdurazo]
- bryan: yes
- 18:52:46 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: ok true... maybe in file tree view
- 18:52:48 [MarkMcCarthy]
- s/suer/sure
- 18:52:55 [Jemma]
- https://w3c.github.io/aria/#treeitem
- 18:53:30 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: would you advocate for aria asertion? and required they should do?
- 18:53:41 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: doesnt have to be in the spec. strictly AT behaviour
- 18:54:21 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: this probably should be in the scope for this issue
- 18:54:34 [isaacdurazo]
- Jemma: action item is for you matt to add a comment
- 18:54:38 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt
- 18:54:47 [isaacdurazo]
- ok I'll still be adding the same question
- 18:55:03 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: want to make sure question is clear
- 18:55:40 [isaacdurazo]
- Matt_King: thanks Bryan for your work on tooltip. Are you able to join the call next week?
- 18:55:46 [isaacdurazo]
- Bryan: yes I will
- 18:56:21 [Matt_King]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 18:56:21 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate https://www.w3.org/2021/06/22-aria-apg-minutes.html Matt_King
- 21:17:25 [Jemma]
- zakim, close agenda item 4
- 21:17:25 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'close agenda item 4', Jemma