– DRAFT –
DXWG Plenary

<Rachel> sure go ahead

<Ana> yes

admin

proposed: accept https://www.w3.org/2021/04/06-dxwg-minutes

<AndreaPerego> +1

<Caroline_> +1

<Ana> +1

<riccardoAlbertoni> 0 (I was not there)

<DaveBrowning> +1

+1

Resolution: accept https://www.w3.org/2021/04/06-dxwg-minutes

DCAT PWD poll ratification

<annette_g> oops, I forgot about the separate poll

<AndreaPerego> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-wg/2021Apr/0093.html

Caroline_: any questions on the DCAT 3?

annette_g: if there are small changes, is there an opportunity to raise them?

<annette_g> +1 to publish

PWinstanley: it is expected that there will be some rough edges, this is a draft for comment

proposed: ratify the poll (n=9) unanimously supporting publication of the draft of DCAT v3 for comment

+1

<riccardoAlbertoni> +1

<DaveBrowning> +1

<AndreaPerego> +1

<Caroline_> +1

<Ana> +1

<annette_g> +1

<Rachel> +1

Resolution: ratify the poll (n=9) unanimously supporting publication of the draft of DCAT v3 for comment

Caroline_: congratulations to the team
… we need to work together to promote the draft and so please can colleagues circulate among contacts and social networks
… Also, we have a moratorium coming up, so need to check with W3C staff to get the publication done ASAP

riccardoAlbertoni: Is there a checklist for ensuring that pubrules etc are satisfied?

AndreaPerego: I've not checked yet

riccardoAlbertoni: the stylesheet has changed a little bit

<AndreaPerego> Might be this one: https://www.w3.org/pubrules/

DaveBrowning: I don't have the list from dcat2, but the rules for working drafts are relatively lax and as long as PLH is happy then we can move ahead afaik

<riccardoAlbertoni> +1 to have a common template

<Caroline_> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/open

<riccardoAlbertoni> closing action 444

<Caroline_> The poll was completed

<AndreaPerego> close action-444

<trackbot> Closed action-444.

riccardoAlbertoni: Action 442 was done as documented in the action itself

close action-442

<trackbot> Closed action-442.

riccardoAlbertoni: Also 440 was done

close action-440

<trackbot> Closed action-440.

riccardoAlbertoni: The same for 438

close action-438

<trackbot> Closed action-438.

riccardoAlbertoni: Action 443 was addressed by alejandra, so we can close it.

close action-443

<trackbot> Closed action-443.

Caroline_: AOB?

AndreaPerego: Maybe check the issues on GitHub
… e.g., those about UCR: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/projects/1

AndreaPerego: About this one https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/5

riccardoAlbertoni: This was related to the fact that the ODRL spec was still under way when we published DQV.
… We added an alignment that is not up to date.
… I guess that we can close it as DQV is not in scope with DXWG.
… But DQV is used so it may be worth updating it in the future, not necessarily inside DXWG.

<Caroline_> +1 to errata about the dqv

<PWinstanley> AndreaPerego: can this be added as an erratum document?

riccardoAlbertoni: That could be an option.

Action: riccardoAlbertoni to check with PLH how to add errata to DQV - ref: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/5

<trackbot> Created ACTION-445 - Check with plh how to add errata to dqv - ref: https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/5 [on Riccardo Albertoni - due 2021-04-27].

Caroline_: About https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/162
… AndreaPerego, are you suggesting to close it?

AndreaPerego: I think an option is just to drop the UCR tag, and keep it only for Profile Guidance.

Caroline_: The question is whether having it would be useful if we issue another UCR document in the future.

riccardoAlbertoni: I am not sure we are going to have a new UCR, considering the deadline for the WG.

<PWinstanley> +1 to the idea that we have timed out on the UCR situation

<PWinstanley> AndreaPerego: maybe just the 'safe' option of dropping the UCR tag?

proposed: drop https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/162 from UCR

+1

<Caroline_> +1

<annette_g> +1

<Ana> +1

<DaveBrowning> +1

<PWinstanley> +1

<riccardoAlbertoni> +1

Resolution: drop https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/162 from UCR

Caroline_: Anything else?

all: [silence]

<riccardoAlbertoni> thanks all for the discussion, bye

[meeting adjourned]

<Rachel> Apologies my meeting collapsed , bye