DXWG DCAT subgroup teleconference

Meeting minutes

<riccardoAlbertoni> RSAgent, draft minutes

<riccardoAlbertoni> R

approve last meeting minutes

<riccardoAlbertoni> PROPOSED: approve last meeting minutes https://www.w3.org/2021/03/17-dxwgdcat-minutes

<riccardoAlbertoni> +1

<DaveBrowning> +1

Resolution: approve last meeting minutes https://www.w3.org/2021/03/17-dxwgdcat-minutes

<riccardoAlbertoni> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2021.03.31

approve agenda

<riccardoAlbertoni> +1

<DaveBrowning> +1

DCAT3 2PWD publication

<riccardoAlbertoni> https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#changes-since-20201217

riccardoAlbertoni: We have advanced with the document.
… We should probably need to have a PWD before the end of May.
… But maybe we can go for the end of April to get some feedback.

<riccardoAlbertoni> https://w3c.github.io/spec-releases/milestones/?rec=2022-01-25

<DaveBrowning> +1 for end April

<riccardoAlbertoni> ack

DaveBrowning: Having a PWD could be a good way to get feedback and move things forward.

<riccardoAlbertoni> planning to deliver the 2pwg to the group one week before 20th DXWG meeting and ask for endorsing

<DaveBrowning> +1

<riccardoAlbertoni> +1

Resolution: planning to deliver the 2pwg to the group one week before 20th DXWG meeting and ask for endorsing

time for meeting apr-nov

riccardoAlbertoni: Wanted to check which is the best time.
… But probably we should just do an email poll.

DaveBrowning: It may be a good thing to make the offer to move the meeting time, and see what people say.

riccardoAlbertoni: Agreed. In case we can always set up a doodle poll.

Request from plenary

AndreaPerego: There was a request to indicate the exact issues we would like to have more feedback.

[discussion]

<riccardoAlbertoni> Make URIs vs. IRIs consistent in the DCAT document #1341 https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1341

open issues

riccardoAlbertoni: We need to check that we can completely switch to IRI.

AndreaPerego: My impression is that we can simple switch.

riccardoAlbertoni: Who is volunteering to give it a try?

AndreaPerego: I can do

Action: AndreaPerego to address https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1341 by switching to IRIs

<trackbot> Created ACTION-442 - Address https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1341 by switching to iris [on Andrea Perego - due 2021-04-07].

https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1246

riccardoAlbertoni: This is about changing labels for some properties.

<riccardoAlbertoni> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1246#issuecomment-809312874

riccardoAlbertoni: Asking to have "has" in front of the label.
… We proposed some solutions ^^
… Current proposal is to keep things untouched, but add a skos:altLabel for the DCAT3 TTL.

proposed: use skos:altLabel only on DCAT3 TTL

<riccardoAlbertoni> +1

<DaveBrowning> +1

Resolution: use skos:altLabel only on DCAT3 TTL

<riccardoAlbertoni> “A curated collection of metadata about resources (e.g., datasets and data services in the context of a data catalog)”

riccardoAlbertoni: The request was also to change the above def ^^
… and putting it in a usage note.
… I don't see issues in doing this.

AndreaPerego: No issue either from my side.

<riccardoAlbertoni> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1334

AndreaPerego: About the request on expanding definition of spatial resolution, I would wait for feedback from Anna.

riccardoAlbertoni: About #1334, it is not completely clear to me the reported issue.

AndreaPerego: As that axiomatisation comes from discussion in #124, Simon is the best to understand the implications.