tony: last week , thinking about move to PR
… any objection in moving to PR?
… no objections
… can do this before the IPR ends.
wendy: only IRP related timing is exclsion be over by the time we are ready to pub the recommendation
tony: one more thing. re-naming the master branch
… do this after we go to level 2 - after we pass recommendation
selfissue: this can be very disruptive, lets finish before we have to start over.
wendy: no problem. seems like good time to make updates
tony: we will do this before we go Level 3
tony: any progress on 7 open editorial issues
… close or punt?
… some untrained issues.
<jeffh> untriaged issues: https://
bradley: contact NIST and work with them
tony: pause for procedural issue
… we have request for invited expert
jeffH: step 12 is the issue, we already do that
… I suggested getting his hands on the credential
… this looks like editorial, or even do we need to clarify
tony: we can make it a CR or PR item
jeffH: triage to REC and call it editorial
wendy has extended offer to invited expert
breadley: this sounds more like a deployment issue
tony: put it in notes and milestones
bradley: other things like transport to consideer
jeffH: this is a process one; do we need to do this for L2 REC?
wendy: will it be taken as an objection if it is not done.
… could it rise to level of formal objection
agl: can we address this
tony: suggest we do 2 and 3 with eye on getting to recommendation
jeffH: we should get this done.
bradley: we should figure out now many how to distribute work on non-modal UI, and authenticator sync credentials
… non-modal is in Web Authn
agl: we have hopes and ideas at this point.
bradley: time frame?
agl: in the next few months.
… dual 🔑 and non modal
bradley: dual key thing raises what is priority for our current 🔑 recovery proposal
agl: if it makes sense is up to your. both can exist
bradley: if not implemented in platforms, it cold be a waste of time.
agl: it is not our primary thrust for key recovery for masses
… bigget concern is RP support
bradley: will they support more than one method
nickS: at duo, recovery was main issu.
elundberg: might be nice to have a protocol, as an ideology thing.
… then we would have combo of open standard and an extension to that standard.
… more on an ideology levle
bradley: is there something is emil's proposal that would work.
elundberg: dual issue?
agl: could have more than one key, key that is synchronized and one that does not
… leave the platform
that is issue #1546
bradley: may be something here for roaming authenticators.
… authenticators that are not synced may be able to use same path for key recovery
… could be some alignment for key recovery schemes
tony: anything else?