W3C

WoT Scripting API

30 Nov 2020

Attendees

Present
Kaz_Ashimura, Cristiano_Aguzzi, Daniel_Peintner, Tomoaki_Mizushima, Zoltan_Kis
Regrets
Chair
Daniel
Scribe
dape

Contents


Last minutes approval

<scribe> scribe: dape

<kaz> Nov-23

All: no objections -> approved

Minutes takers

Daniel: propose some kind of scribe role?

Cristiano: scribe rotation

Daniel: +1

Kaz: name of scribe to agenda, like in main call

Daniel: task on my side , put agenda up before the call

Cristiano: +1

Publication

https://www.w3.org/TR/wot-scripting-api/

Daniel: Thank you kaz for the work and fixes

Kaz: updated references

Dp: I believe there were more links

Kaz: Editors could help updating the links also
... several broken links

Daniel: brink back the links Kaz fixed
... i will try to do provide PR

<kaz> Kaz's message sent to the Members list

<kaz> final message

Kaz: I will take care, might be safer

Daniel: Thanks, Kaz, see https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/284

Next Steps / open issues

Daniel: reference WoT documents, https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/278

Kaz: Not sure what we should do best
... as long as we publish on the same day it is not a problem

Daniel: let's update the links and do like we did in the past

Kaz: depends on the document we refer to
... using dated-uri is the right way

Daniel: I see

kaz: my PR will include these updates

Daniel: thanks!
... Issues 233, https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/issues/227

Cristiano: Old issues from wot repo

Daniel: Scripting API versioning #224

Cristiano: Yes, can think about possible solutions
... context file version

Daniel: This would disallow moving faster

Cristiano: Sync between TD and ScriptingAPI

Zoltan: should link the version itself, to be sure which algorithms are in place

Daniel: 2 versions?
... TD version implicit?

Cristiano/Zoltan: Yes, implicit

Cristiano: start with 1.1

Zoltan: 3 numbers?

Daniel: node-wot version in sync?

Zoltan: No need, node-wot can link "specversion" or "apiversion"

Cristiano: +1

Daniel: 2 points: apiversion in document and webidl should have a way to report version

Zoltan: 1. WoT namespace readonly version
... 2. text, algorithm, describing what does it return
... align names, avoid clashes
... "version" should be ok
... use case for having version in script?

Cristiano: displaying version I am running

Zoltan: documentation information enough?

Cristiano: Portable script running in different runtimes

Zoltan: feature detection does not go by version ?
... currently we have 3 conformance classes
... version does not help here

Cristiano: node has different version
... does it support runtime discovery ?
... like web workers and processes... depending on version?

Next Calls

Daniel: skip 21, 28 December and 4 January

marketing text

https://w3c.github.io/wot-marketing/activities/tf-scripting/

Zoltan: use abstract from document

<kaz> [adjourned]

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

[End of minutes]

Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version (CVS log)
$Date: 2020/12/14 11:47:18 $