<scribe> Meeting: RPC
[JLR gossip]
MagnusF: I now have a validator
for YAML and now a code generator for both north and southbound
interfaces
... we'll need this at Toyota but we do not have a clear path
for open sourcing yet
... I know we are looking at other things like WoT. this is a
primary focus of mine
Ted reports his outreach to CharIN EV, should look at other use cases
MagnusF: let's look at some
simpler use cases and willing to transcribe those into YAML and
be able to contrast with WoT
... we clearly will need some basic use cases
... maybe SOTA?
Gunnar: Esync Alliance perhaps,
we talked with them about CVII
... at the least we need to coordinate with them
MagnusF: SOTA going to be part of CVII?
Gunnar: perhaps for reaching out
to connected vehicle and data transfer
... high level interest
MagnusF: they have on-board agents?
Gunnar: no, not handling dynamic
code from what I understand
... believe they are more on the protocol level
MagnusF: in Toyota we're more interested in on-board communication whereas others focused off
Ted: Remote Diagnostics - gets political
Rudi: non-standardized and yes there will be some resistance
[CCC seems very proprietary and not much public information. StO?]
[someone has a higher level contact there...]
MagnusF: let's not leave
diagnostics. it is well understood space (esp with older
standards DOIP)
... anything more modern without hex codes etc?
Joakim: I agree
Gunnar: my thought was it could
be anything the OEM wants to define it to be
... any data can be used for diagnostic purposes
... we talking about DTC?
Joakim: semantics to DID
MagnusF: and ability to call diagnostic routines
Gunnar: in VSS there are discussions on adding diagnostic data in the tree, we should connect those discussions
MagnusF: this might be worth exploring further
Rudi: extension of VSS with generic diagnostics tree is a promising approach
MagnusF: we could deliver DTC through VSS, functions via RPC
Rudi: it could be as simple as a wrapper around DTC/DID
MagnusF: they have aging history that might be hard to represent
https://github.com/GENIVI/vehicle_signal_specification/issues/165
MagnusF: still don't want old school DTC
Rudi: yes, but may be useful for widespread acceptance and can then modernize
[updates on status, next steps in wiki. added climate control use case]
This is scribe.perl Revision of Date Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Present: MagnusF Ted Joakim Rudi MagnusG Gunnar Adnan No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: ted Inferring Scribes: ted WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found. WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth WARNING: No date found! Assuming today. (Hint: Specify the W3C IRC log URL, and the date will be determined from that.) Or specify the date like this: <dbooth> Date: 12 Sep 2002 People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option. WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found! Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>. Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of new discussion topics or agenda items, such as: <dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]