<kaz> scribenick: FarshidT
<kaz> vTPAC minutes
<kaz> Oct-12 minutes
McCool: will go through TPAC minutes.
This will probably take a whole hour. Let's review the Oct-12
minutes first.
... "fix error" should be changed to "fix respec errors"
... no objections, publishing the discovery minutes.
... next is TPAC minutes
... ToC links are not working
Kaz: there was a typo. Fixed now.
McCool: who is Joshue108?
Kaz: that is Josh O Connor from the W3C Team
McCool: wondering about how to describe the scribes' names
Kaz: scribe names follow the IRC nicknames
McCool: typo: rought
Kaz: fixed
McCool: geospatial queries are
complicated. Have to organize a call with them.
... well-know -> well-known
... add "for example" before "an ip address"
Kaz: fixed both
McCool: "we have consider" -> "we have been considering"
Kaz: done
McCool: sensible -> sensitive
Kaz: fixed
McCool: we gotta use TDD consistently. This was done well in the minutes.
Kaz: "verified credentials" -> "Verifiable Credentials"
McCool: "this topic" -> discussion on use during other stages
<inserted> kaz: fixed
McCool: what does "active"
mean?
... it is about life cycle. Does "active" mean registered and
ready to respond? Need to clarify. Making an issue.
https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/91
McCool: described the issue on
github.
... trusty -> trusted
... Creating a github issue for the point raised by kaz related
to trustability, response time, etc
https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/92
Farshid: it is also about directories that are meant as different registries. E.g. manufactured things vs operational things.
McCool: describing the issue on Github
Cristiano: this was also raised in TD call. Link above
McCool: going through Thing Model
issue
... ben has downvoted, need to ask why
Farshid: why no keep the example TD instead of TD Model? The current example TD contains example security definitions.
Cristiano: TD Model spec may be extended to also allow model templating.
McCool: need to consider our use case in TD discussions (comment on github issue)
Issue: https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/86
McCool: restfull -> RESTful
... adding an issue for JSON Lines (https://jsonlines.org/)
https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/93
McCool: json-line -> JSON
Lines
... updating the QUIC / HTTP/3 issue (https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/84)
... Web Transport WG?
Kaz: that WG is expected to discuss how to apply QUIC to applications
McCool: W3C API
Kaz: this is about API design and pagination to access the W3C DB
McCool: commenting on issue https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/16
... PATCH complications
... creating an issue
https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/issues/94
Kaz: we still need two implementations for optional features as well.
Farshid: the spec is already there, treating objects as plain JSONs
Cristiano: the protocol is fine. The request body may not be JSON-LD
McCool: stopping at Syntactic queries
section
... will continue the minutes review next week
... merging PR https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/pull/89
closing
McCool: more cancellations in December
<kaz> We'll continue the minutes review from the topic on "Syntactic Queries"
<kaz> [adjourned]