W3C

- DRAFT -

Cognitive and Learning Disabilities Accessibility Task Force Teleconference

22 Oct 2020

Attendees

Present
Jennie, JohnRochford, Roy, stevelee, LisaSeemanKest, AbiJ, BetsyFurler_
Regrets
Chair
SV_MEETING_CHAIR
Scribe
stevelee

Contents


<LisaSeemanKest> wcag on our decisions policy https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cognitive-a11y-tf/2020Oct/0048.html

<LisaSeemanKest> regret: justine

<LisaSeemanKest> regret: justine, john k

<LisaSeemanKest> scribe: stevelee

<LisaSeemanKest> next,item

<LisaSeemanKest> next item

Rachel: process issues marked for action - will be complete next week.

jennie: finished one pattern, one to do

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1O3zMXCDhycSTxY4ofpT3-Tf7MQnoZ890naMRkNXwoNk/edit#gid=0

jennie: should have update on images in next day or 2

wcag on our decisions policy https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cognitive-a11y-tf/2020Oct/0048.html

<Rachael> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/coga/decision-policy

Lisa: do we need to +1 the AGWG and APA CFCs for our decision process?

xaur https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cognitive-a11y-tf/2020Oct/0039.html

rachael: will email APA

steve: will email Jamie to see if he can review or has requirements

<Jennie> https://www.w3.org/groups/tf/cognitive-a11y-tf/participants

Jennie: Jamie does not appear to be on the member list ^^^^

actions and upsates

standard texts : https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fc7TI8V6dNgFrD6wzGR8CjbbtO7Az0U-zYylrRSy8QQ/edit#heading=h.f830s7ypu4na

<JohnRochford> Yes.

<JohnRochford> In a noisy environment

<JohnRochford> I work with an AR/VR expert for people with cognitive disabilities.

<JohnRochford> Would you like me to reach out to her?

<LisaSeemanKest> yes.

<LisaSeemanKest> https://www.w3.org/TR/xaur/

<JohnRochford> See https://www.linkedin.com/in/julemoine/

<LisaSeemanKest> cc the task force

<JohnRochford> Yes. Will do.

<LisaSeemanKest> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fc7TI8V6dNgFrD6wzGR8CjbbtO7Az0U-zYylrRSy8QQ/edit#heading=h.4fkyqcdy4ymh

This ^^ is the Google document for tracking our work on all external feedback receive during wide Review of Content Usable

<LisaSeemanKest> happy with standard text 1

<LisaSeemanKest> +1

<BetsyFurler_> +1

<LisaSeemanKest> +1

+1

<Rachael> Standard text 1: +1

<BetsyFurler_> +1

<Jennie> +1

<EA> +1

<Roy> +1

Lisa: do not need to approve the response for each one using standard text 1

EA feel Standard text 2 is too long as is

<LisaSeemanKest> +1

<LisaSeemanKest> standard text 2

<EA> +1

<LisaSeemanKest> +1

+1

<LisaSeemanKest> any objections

<LisaSeemanKest> ?

actions and upsates

abis's email https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cognitive-a11y-tf/2020Oct/0043.html

<LisaSeemanKest> https://github.com/w3c/coga/issues/195

<LisaSeemanKest> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1l5xiuYG2IYBP7vgS5FSzOPJ1NtJdPRSckpY6tt3n9IE/edit#

<_BetsyFurler_> I think no hyphen

Lisa do we prefer short term with or without hyphen.

<_BetsyFurler_> Two words. Short term.

ea: US is probably using hyphen, UK without

<Jennie> And, depending on verbosity settings of a text to speech tool, it may interrupt hearing the word without the punctuation

Readability Guidelines say only use a hyphen if it helps make more readable

<AbiJ> +1 no hyphen

agree no hyphen

<AbiJ> Sentence is - "For example, a symbol user wants to send a message to their doctor. They can press the login with the icon they know and send a message."

Lisa how about "symbol and AAC"

<EA> +1 to what Jennie says

<EA> Easyreading.eu project supplies symbols to aid comprehension

<LisaSeemanKest> symbol user - people who use symbols to help understanding

EA: agree are more uses of symbols other than AAC but understand Abi's POV

Jeni: AAC is for use for communication and also some people use symbols to create input

lisa: the context is provide "provide an alternative log in that does not use a lot of words"

abi: if we have problems defining symbols user we need to review it.

jennie: agree. Plus symbols might be on the page or elsewhere

<EA> This is why icons and symbols need to be considered as different things

<AbiJ> +1

<LisaSeemanKest> symbol user removed. replace with someone with a launge disability or aac user as relivent

Lisa: "symbols user" is to be replaced with "someone with a language disability or AAC user"

ea: problem with AAC is people do not understand what it means. Also symbols is used for various things

<Jennie> And designers may also use symbols and icons differently

Lisa: I mean we replace "symbols user" with approriate language forthe case
... we have an editors call next

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

[End of minutes]

Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version (CVS log)
$Date: 2020/10/22 15:05:09 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision of Date 
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Default Present: Jennie, JohnRochford, Roy, stevelee, LisaSeemanKest, AbiJ
Present: Jennie JohnRochford Roy stevelee LisaSeemanKest AbiJ BetsyFurler_
Found Scribe: stevelee
Inferring ScribeNick: stevelee

WARNING: No meeting chair found!
You should specify the meeting chair like this:
<dbooth> Chair: dbooth

Found Date: 22 Oct 2020
People with action items: 

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


WARNING: IRC log location not specified!  (You can ignore this 
warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain 
a link to the original IRC log.)


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]