McCool: no guests today
<kaz> Sep-30
<inserted> scribenick: sebastian
check the minutes from last week
any objections?
no
joint meeting with LBD CG in TD TF call on November 18
McCool: Profile and Architecture
resolution will be done in tomorrow's Arch call
... we need decission about the URL shortname of the new
version
... e.g., https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld11/
vs. https://www.w3.org/TR/ttml-imsc1.1/
vs. https://www.w3.org/TR/accname-1.1/
... any preferences?
<kaz> there is a version guide no concrete information about the version numver within a shortname itself
McCool: shall the root domain of the specification forward to the latest version?
<kaz> [kaz: I'm OK with "*-1-1" notation though I've been using "11" myself for years :) ]
McCool: no decision today, discuss this next time
<kaz> ACTION: kaz to ask PLH about the latest *trend*
McCool: Lets discuss this in Arch call tomorrow
McCool: we had some joint meetings
like JSON-LD, DID and PBG
... today APA and tomorrow WNIG
... we need to decide about the breakout sessions
... there is a doodle poll
https://doodle.com/poll/d6bs7sqwcisx78ka
McCool: shall wait one more day?
<kaz> TPAC schedule page says Oct 19 is the deadline for proposals
<McCool> propose 27 Oct at 9am EDT for breakout
McCool: will prepare a presentation
<McCool> review presentation material on Oct 20 during marketing call
McCool: shows overview which TF
meetings are cancelled
... Arch call is not cancelled for Oct 22
Lagally: tomorrow's Arch call will start 1h later
Cristiano: Scripting will take place on Oct 19
McCool: will update wiki for breakout session together with Kaz
Kaz: FYI, I'm planning to have another breakout session about Smart City
McCool: Idea to mirror WoT standards to ISO/IEC
Sebastian: support this idea. In industry / automotive is quite typically to follow ISO/IEC standards
Lagally: is there a liason with ISO?
W3C Liaison page: https://www.w3.org/2001/11/StdLiaison
Kaz: For example, the W3C Web Content Accessibility Guidelines was transformed to ISO with an HTML file via the PAS mechanism
... if we really would like to try, I think we could do it for WoT as well. however, we need to consult with the W3M about the procedure
W3C Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
discussion about the ITU-T liason
<mlagally_> https://github.com/w3c/wot-usecases/blob/master/CONTRIBUTIONS/ITU-T-SG-20%20OLS%20-%20DRAFT.md
shows the ITU-T contribution
its a W3C internal draft
McCool: will send a email to Jeff and Wendy ask about the status
McCool: any other business?
Farshid: we can check PR from discovery?
<kaz> wot-discovery PR 85
McCool: I'm going to merge this. One
more week for review.
... resolution will be done next week (Oct. 22)
<Zakim> kaz, you wanted to ask McCool to review https://github.com/w3c/wot-scripting-api/pull/271
Kaz: request McCool to check the PR
McCool: np
Sebastian: please review the latest TD 1.1 draft
Lagally: same for Arch and
Profile
... lets go to the APA joint call
<kaz> [5 min break; and APA joint]
<kaz> [adjourned]