W3C

- DRAFT -

Personalization Task Force Teleconference

05 Oct 2020

Attendees

Present
becky, Roy, CharlesL, sajkaj, Janina, LisaSeemanKest, LisaSeemanKest_, sharon
Regrets
Chair
sharon
Scribe
janinia

Contents


<scribe> chair: janina

TPAC

<CharlesL> scribe: janinia

<CharlesL> chair: sharon

bg: Request in for Thursday morning (Eastern). Still awaiting response.

[discussion of agenda for proposed mtg]

becky: recalling question re micro-formats from TAG

ss: later on the agenda

js: suggests our agenda is :


. 1.) Have we satisfied concerns over moving forward to CR/PR?
. 2.) Support for reserved prefix request to WHAT-WG

Explainer - https://w3c.github.io/personalization-semantics/

ss: Expecting some minor updates--redlining

Requirements - https://raw.githack.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/requirements-punctuation-edits09-29/requirements/index.html

ss: Chls found a few items, now fixed

bg: OK now

js: +1

ss: So, Roy should go ahead and pub

Tag issue - https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/476

ss: This is re response to tTAG

<sharon> http://microformats.org/wiki/microformats2

ss: Seems focussed to html, and supercede microdata and rdfa
... limited support for parsers
... they say: "incorporate lessons learned from microdata and rdfa"
... intended to simplify

bg: So how do our requirements extend their spec?

ss: limited vocab, and still in draft
... unclear how active

js: is it W3C?

bg: seems specific to their existing vocab

<becky> http://html5doctor.com/microformats/

bg: also about broader applicabioitn
... tantec suggested not good fit

ss: looks at fcomment re qutocomplete; that it overlaps at 100%

cl: we did that on purpose

bg: but we go beyond form fields

ss: we reuse them

cl: yes

ss: we should reference the video with our examples

bg: add a bit about tools that will consume: extensions, aac tools; we're enabling additional ui
... looks at overlapping but distinct users, suggesting separating them out?

ss: we did that

bg: but where intersections arecL: notes epub3 now chartered; publishing now including media

js: notes epub a major consumer of our spec

bg: also a good reason microformats doesn't fit

js: suggests drafting responses and forwarding to TAG

bg: will try to have it ready for planning call

ss: anything else?

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

[End of minutes]

Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version (CVS log)
$Date: 2020/10/05 14:40:50 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision of Date 
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Default Present: becky, Roy, CharlesL, sajkaj, Janina, LisaSeemanKest, LisaSeemanKest_, sharon
Present: becky Roy CharlesL sajkaj Janina LisaSeemanKest LisaSeemanKest_ sharon
No ScribeNick specified.  Guessing ScribeNick: janina
Found Scribe: janinia
Found Date: 05 Oct 2020
People with action items: 

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


WARNING: IRC log location not specified!  (You can ignore this 
warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain 
a link to the original IRC log.)


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]