W3C

- DRAFT -

Web Authentication WG

30 Sep 2020

Agenda

Attendees

Present
jfontana, jeffh, agl, akshay, nadalin, davidturner, rae, sbweeden, wseltzer, elundberg, nina, jeremy, eric, davidwaite, nsteele
Regrets
Chair
Nadalin, Fontana
Scribe
jfontana

Contents


<wseltzer> presen agl, akshay, nadalin, davidturner, jeffh, rae, sbweeden, wseltzer

<wseltzer> present agl, akshay, nadalin, davidturner, jeffh, rae, sbweeden, wseltzer

https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1470

tony: any objection to merge

https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1474

tonu: Apple will not make it today. No word on attstation

https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1488

JeffH: trying to deal with 1441
... submitter makes guidance normaitve

tony: agl, jeffH, selfissue to look at this.

jeffH: elundburg approved this

tony: takes us through pull requests.
... untriaged issues. there is one
... process issue, so go to issues

https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1486

jeffH: assigns it to himself

tony: what do we do with #1174

https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1174

tony: are people still interested

agl: uncomfortable with this, it is running out of steam

akshay: I don't think this belongs in web authn spec

tony: is anyone against closing.

no response

tony: close?
... say we won't address in web authn

agl: I think so, it does not impede doing things in browser

tony: or move to future

agl: not sure there will be future changes

jeffH: lets close. closed

agl: will we continue to wait for apple, we have a sept. milestone.

tony: I don't have a time line on the decision

agl: attestation formats can live elsewhere, we won't destroy anything by going forward

tony: do we wait?

shane: I'd like to see it go in , but been saying that for weeks

akshay: we have to move forward at some time

jeffh: can document at another time and then put it into the registry.

shane: would be fine to get it off the apple dev. site when it is ready

jbradley: we should document is separately, but it won't make us in the fido server certification

nickS: move on.

agl: can your look at #470

#1470

https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pulls/1471

jbradley: I will work on this

correction: https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pulls/1470

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

[End of minutes]

Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version (CVS log)
$Date: 2020/09/30 19:25:14 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision of Date 
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Present: jfontana jeffh agl akshay nadalin davidturner rae sbweeden wseltzer elundberg nina jeremy eric davidwaite nsteele
No ScribeNick specified.  Guessing ScribeNick: jfontana
Inferring Scribes: jfontana

WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found.

Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webauthn/2020Sep/0148.html

WARNING: No date found!  Assuming today.  (Hint: Specify
the W3C IRC log URL, and the date will be determined from that.)
Or specify the date like this:
<dbooth> Date: 12 Sep 2002

People with action items: 

WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found!  
Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>.

Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of 
new discussion topics or agenda items, such as:
<dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report


WARNING: IRC log location not specified!  (You can ignore this 
warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain 
a link to the original IRC log.)


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]