astearns: First item was meta-issue by bkardell_
bkardell_: number of issues
brought to F2F last year
... but concern about not having enough context
... spec wasn't clear enough
... so filed an issue to explain the context of the MathML
proposal
... and how these CSS proposals fit into that context
astearns: Does anyone have questions about the overall projecthere?
iank_: Might be helpful if we get an update for impl in Chromium
<fredw> hi
fredw: Been working on MathML
Core Level 1 specification
... try to extract core concepts of MathML to implement in
Chromium
... Several things related to styling
... It was difficult to implement without writing CSS
... e.g. want to modify font, interact with font size
... also I think one argument that ian was making
... How implemented in WebKit / Gecko is internal
... not really exposed to users
... nicer to implement in a way that integrates with CSS, so
can use CSS to modify
... work in Chromium for MathML, more or less done with the
work plan for this year
... Already implemented most of the CSS proposals in
Chromium
... Only thing missing is text-transform, due to some
controversy
... and the script-level issue
... need to update in response to feedback
bkardell_: worth saying context
of meta-issue is that MathML didn't have very good
interop
... lot of things that were underdefined, not explained how
they fit into the platform
... answers duplicated with CSS solutions
... so as part of work in Chromium, chrome team has been very
good at making sure we have necessary answers
iank_: I've been pretty impressed
with how things have been going
... principle of using CSS, ability to drop in a grid into a
MathML structure, really great to see
astearns: Remaining issues that
are linked from this meta-issue are things that are working in
Chromium, just looking to standardize?
... or still bits to work out
fredw: More or less implemented
in Chromium, but still have some flexibility to change. But it
works
... Some of these things are implemented in Gecko as internal
CSS properties
... would just need to actually expose them
... WebKit want to do the same
github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5385
bkardell_: 2 ways of integrating
math into text
... inline style or block style
... proposal is to add display style
... there was a comment in the issue that it should be "inline
math" instad of "inline-math"
astearns: It would be a display-inside value
iank_: I think web devs are quite
used to 'inline-foo' pattern
... math is an inside display type, but maybe add as an
alias
TabAtkins: I agree
... if we were adding a bunch more at once, could maybe make a
clean break
... but just one would feel inconsistent
... so would say add inline-math into the table, easy
dholbert: Other places where 'display: contents' is like none?
faceless2: SVG
TabAtkins: various form elements, replaced elements
astearns: So we want ...?
TabAtkins: Add math to <display-inside>, add inline-math to <display-legacy>
iank_: It's basically zero overhead to add inline-math and convenient to authors
astearns: What happens to 'inline-math' on non-MathML elements?
fredw: Would behave like none
faceless2: I thought behaved like mrow
NeilS: Unrecognized elements in MathML context only
<bkardell_> fantasai: generally speaking we try to avoid having things disappear if you do something slightly wrong
<bkardell_> fantasai: I don't think it should behave as display none on unrecognized elements. The fact that display contents does that is really only because we couldnt' think of another way, but that isn't a good pattern
astearns: My expectation was
behave like 'flow' on non-MathML element
... either inline or block
iank_: If you have div { display: math; }, will effectively create a block flow internally
fredw: create a block node
iank_: would change box tree slightly
fredw: that's also what we do if don't set display: math on math element
<dholbert> for comparison / reference, data:text/html,<input type="radio" style="display:flex"> still renders as a radio button (we don't force it to display:none)
bkardell_: Unknown element will by default do what you're asking for, but what happens if you set 'display: math' explicitly on it, do something it can't do
fantasai: Ignoring isn't an option, can make it behave as a different value though
RESOLUTION: Add 'math' as a <display-inside> value.
RESOLUTION: Add 'inline-math' as a <display-legacy> value.
RESOLUTION: 'math' outside of MathML context behaves as 'flow'
emilio: Does it behave as or compute to flow?
TabAtkins: whichever is easiest
emilio: compute to is more likely
to be easier
... it's what we do for 'display: contents'
RESOLUTION: 'math' outside of MathML context computes to 'flow'
emilio: What if you have a non-MathML element inside a MathML element?
fredw: An element not in MathML namespace?
emilio: document.createElement('div') and append to math element
iank_: should work
emilio: should work how?
fredw: not defined
emilio: should be defined
... SVG just doesn't create boxes for those elements
... if you have a random div in SVG, doesn't do much. Not a fan
of this.
NeilS: I thought MathML spec said it would be treated as an mrow?
fredw: non-MathML element, so not in the MathML namespace
NeilS: I thought we'd treat as unknown element, whether in mathml namespace or not
iank_: I don't think you
specifically want that
... the way that MathML core is currently specified, we can
accept arbitrary elements inside MathML subtree
... all the integration points, because more closely tied to
CSS, should just work
... if you have a div inside a mathML mrow or something like
that, that should lay out as block
fantasai: Should lay out as block inside, whatever MathML wants to do inside
astearns: Seems need to do something around this, but let's get to other issues in the agenda
<faceless2> In SVG, unknown elements collapse to a <g> normally, or a <tspan> if they're inside a <text>
fantasai: Might make sense if you set div { display: math; } then behave same as unknown mathml namespace element with that, treat as mrow
<TabAtkins> Yup, and <mrow> is the mathml equivalent to a <g> basically
emilio: A bit skeptical that that
works
... if you put a float inside mathml?
iank_: Like flex/grid, it
blockifies.
... doesn't float
emilio: but you need to define
these cases.
... how does abspos behave, what's the containing block
... etc.
fredw: tried to write this up in the spec
astearns: Let's raise issue on spec and come back to it some other day
emilio: I don't think these are obscure cases.
github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5386
bkardell_: MathML created and
exists with lots of tools/systems that don't have full access
to Unicode
... So legacy documents and even things written before that
available
... so number of case where the markup itself contains the
information that you need in order to understand that this
character that we want to render isn't the literal text value
of the element
... text-transforms were the solutions that we used
... because that's what needs to happen
... didn't see any reason to make that specifically hidden or
unavailable to users
... I know fantasai and Florian had raised some concerns last
time
... we've talked a bunch since then
... fantasai has updated the meta-advice in css-text-3 to
provide some nuance
... the meaning *is* in the document
... I don't know if ppl still object to these or what
fredw: 2 separate cases
... case of math-auto, which is automatic italic
... and this is the most important one
... Not adding any semantics
... default var rendered as italic
... the other was strings for tools/documents not using
Unicode
... we are using text-transform to do the transformation even
if MathML says to preserve the semantic
... maybe a bit controversial
... Florian was saying it's OK as long as we have the
mathvariant attribute in the markup
... if ppl really don't like, can only add math-auto one
... might break some back compat, might need a polyfill,
but...
NeilS: could be done internally
and not break anything
... My concern is a11y, will changed character be in the a11y
tree
bkardell_: had several ppl who
implement screenreaders saying that the transform value is
exposed on existing ones, and that was a sticking point because
we don't always want that
... certainly we can go either way here
... either it will be, or it won't be, exposed to
screenreaders
NeilS: As long as exposed to screenreaders, then no a11y issue
<faceless2> +1 to Neils comment
bkardell_: There's a specific
example in the issue itself
... to non-Math ppl like myself, not intuitive
emilio: Proposal of
math-auto
... is it like user-select, like auto behaves as inherit or
something?
... it's not clear to me
... seems like pseudo-code that Rob posted would be computed
value time which is a bit odd
fredw: basically transformation,
whether italic or not [...]
... it doesn't compute to italic
iank_: would it be fair to say that you'd apply to ...
fredw: only to mi element
... mi { text-transform: math-auto }
... Takes effect when only one letter
... don't think it can be computed
iank_: the specific variant is based on the attribute on the mi element?
bkardell_: in the example or in
general?
... mi is special, because it has this idea of a single-letter
identifier
... those are treated stylistically a certain way
... but that's only stylistic, no meaning
... but math-variant is where you provide additional semantics
missing from your lack of character support
iank_: so if you have mathvariant specified, it turns off that auto text-transform behavior?
faceless2: mathvariant is acting
as a preshint
... but math-auto, if no other math-transform is set
... it would be italicized if it was one letter
iank_: so also have all the other math transform values
fredw: can override the default behavior
iank_: so it's for this leaf to do this slight magical behavior
NeilS: I think math-auto is
really presentation
... Others are there for legacy issue, and not presentation,
should actually map to a different character
... that's why may not be appropriate for CSS
<bkardell_> fantasai: I guess I have 1 question and 1 concern...
<bkardell_> fantasai: does the auto italic thing be a text transform really, or does it really just want font styling?
<bkardell_> fredw: the way math fonts are designed, you do
<bkardell_> fantasai: the other ones you do want to be a semantic effect. I am a little uncomfortable with this.
<bkardell_> fantasai: whatever screen readers do it's intention was clear and I don't love changing that
astearns: if this is only way to get semantics for legacy stuff, do we really want to expose it to CSS so that it can be used on new things?
bkardell_: MathML Core 1 is a
pretty minimal subset, there are lots of things that use more
elements than we're including
... and the intent is for mathml to have a healthy future with
additional levels
... so will be unknown elements
... so weird to say you don't have access to the magic to make
other elements work like L1
iank_: broadly agree with
that
... also from what we've heard from screenreader
developers
... this sort of text-transform is only presentation
... that ship sailed a long time ago
bkardell_: it's not that they
couldn't be that
... the new one has to be
iank_: text-transform: uppercase is definitely exposed to screenreaders
NeilS: Another case we haven't
resolved yet
... is hyphen-minus
... vs minus
... They're defined to be equivalents
... it should map hyphen-minus to U+2122 MINUS
... Could imagine that text-transform would be the way to do
this as well
<bkardell_> fantasai: you could go either way with that one
faceless2: You'd also struggle to
do that with text-transform
... apply to whole document, then declaration for e.g. fraktur
would override and disable
bkardell_: I suggest we either resolve or move on
fredw: maybe just resolve on math-auto, and unsure for rest
astearns: I think I heard you say that math-auto is the only one you have implemented so far?
bkardell_: upstream chromium
fredw: we have the others implemented in a separate branch
astearns: so let's resolve on
math-auto
... any objections to adding math-auto to text-transform?
emilio: Not quite objection, but want to clarify how it behaves exactly
astearns: resolve to add, then work on details
RESOLUTION: Add math-auto to text-transform
astearns: still seems like there's concerns around the rest of math-values
faceless2: The only concerns are wrt exposing to screenreaders?
astearns: there seem to be a lot of them, also, that's my concern
fantasai: I don't like adding things that are supposed to alter semantics to CSS.
astearns: let's hold off on these for now
fantasai: ...
iank_: would it be possible to
add a new HTML-level attribute with mathvariant and then, if
you set `text-transform` to auto that'll read the attribute and
apply it?
... Semantics would still be in the document, just whether you
apply it would be in CSS
NeilS: I don't think it makes
sense to add something new
... this is all for legacy support
bkardell_: maybe talk about that, maybe at HTML layer we can do something
NeilS: I have to drop off for another MathML meeting
github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5387
NeilS: 2 ways of displaying math,
one tries to minimize height to fit in lines better
... one is taller one
... shifts positions / sizing rules, etc.
... Designed so you don't have as much gap in lines if you have
math in it
... rules defined in TeXBook
astearns: the switch is true or
false for displaystyle?
... I like normal and compact much better
iank_: Makes sense, but seems to
also be able to affect the font size?
... that will need to be carefully defined
NeilS: That effect is through the scriptlevel feature
fantasai: Affects the font size, indirectly through another property
iank_: Happy to add, pending scriptlevel discussion
astearns: ok, any concerns to
add?
... would it go into display module?
iank_: Goes into MathML Core
RESOLUTION: Add math-style: normal | compact
This is scribe.perl Revision of Date Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/copute/compute/ Default Present: dholbert, fantasai, faceless, bkardell_, emilio, NeilS Present: dholbert fantasai faceless bkardell_ emilio NeilS faceless2 No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: fantasai Inferring Scribes: fantasai WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth WARNING: No date found! Assuming today. (Hint: Specify the W3C IRC log URL, and the date will be determined from that.) Or specify the date like this: <dbooth> Date: 12 Sep 2002 People with action items: WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]