approved
approved
approved
(with the fix for "ca" to "Cristiano")
approved
Lagally: Ilyoung is not around yet, but I've been looking at their documents
https://www.itu.int/ITU-T/recommendations/rec.aspx?rec=11699
https://www.itu.int/ITU-T/recommendations/rec.aspx?rec=12647
https://www.itu.int/ITU-T/recommendations/rec.aspx?rec=13027
https://www.itu.int/ITU-T/recommendations/rec.aspx?rec=13637
Lagally: (goes through those documents)
McCool: we should ask Gyu Myoung
about how they update their documents
... for example, terminology should be aligned with our
work
Lagally: yeah, would have further collaboration as well
McCool: also what "Web interface"
means in their documents
... human interface?
... or including M2M interface?
... also "agent" and "broker", etc.
Y-4400 - T-REC-Y.2063-201207-I
McCool: we should look at what
Mozilla does as well
... there should be some common pattern
(discussion on "Figure 8-1 – Conceptual model of the web of things" on p6)
McCool: wondering what the "agents"
expose, e.g., HTTP
... also is there any entity who does registration?
... also service discovery mechanism
... may be human registers information manually
Kaz: regarding the Figure 8-1,
maybe the "Web of things broker" layer is similar to our
"Binding Templates"
... so we could think about that kind of similarity
... but I believe we should start with concrete use cases and
requirements which are underlying
Lagally: yeah
McCool: a deep dive into Mozilla
architecture might be also useful as well
... maybe we could ask Ben as well to review this
document
... also (as already mentioned) wondering about the discovery
mechanism
Lagally: would everybody to take a
look
... also (as Kaz mentioned) use cases and requirements are very
important too
McCool: Appendix I has description on
"Use cases and scenarios of the web of things"
... about "Home control services using WoT"
... smart home environment
... robot thing is also interesting
... commanding for remote access
... wondering if there are other use cases in other
documents
Lagally: would like to convert new proposals into HTML
McCool: wondering when to convert the new ones into HTML
Lagally: also how to deal with cross reference between vertical ones and horizontal ones
McCool: might want to have a dashboard for cross referencing
https://github.com/w3c/wot-usecases/pull/38
McCool: would like to have input from Jennifer
Jennifer: don't want to make the use case too narrow
McCool: we're concerned about
visualization as well
... related to WebGL, etc.
Lagally: do you want to have some more offline discussion about this use case?
McCool: would have some more one-on-one discussion with Jennifer
Lagally: ok
McCool: we can add a sentence for the moment saying visualization is out of scope
McCool: horizontal discovery use
case
... discovery itself is not a vertical use case but horizontal
technology
Lagally: ok
... do we need further review for this?
Jennifer: let's quickly see this
Lagally: (goes through the proposal)
Jennifer: everything to be sent to a specific network?
McCool: depending on the
requirements
... possibly a distributed mechanism with multiple
networks
... single network is appropriate for smarthome use cases,
though
Jennifer: ok
... fine with having a generic description for this
McCool: ok
... the point here is having generic distributed mechanism as
well
... maybe we can add a comment on discovery service
Lagally: people may think the "service" is hosted by some device server
McCool: "discovery service" here is
more abstract one
... maybe would be clearer to say "discover mechanism"
here
... which possibly includes several components
Lagally: (creates a new issue for
wot-architecture)
... incorporate the discovery terminology into terminology
section
<mlagally> https://github.com/w3c/wot-architecture/issues/530
Lagally: what about "Variants" here?
McCool: let's not merge this yet but think about the terminology a bit more
Jennifer: thought this proposal is almost ok from my viewpoint
McCool: will go through the proposal again
Lagally: btw, we should add Jennifer to the "Reviewer(s)" section
McCool: ok
Lagally: will remind our ITU-T colleagues of the joint discussion.
[adjourned]