start with PRs
https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1450
tony: jeffH and mike have approved
https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1451
tony: emil can you approve
elundberg: yes
https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1452
jeffH: the loosening of restrictions on RPID, I have written, sure an RPID can be an arbitrary string as long as not down through Web Authn API
tony: does it impact SPWG in FIDO land
jeffH: I don't think so
... this is already being done, we are just documenting it.
jbradley: this might upset the SPWG, but it is outside the authenticator
jeffH: it is between the RP and
the authenticator
... things already being done, extensions or running native
apps, they are not using Web Authn API
agl: is this about non-discoverable credentials
jeffH: yes.
AGL: in think SSH is discoverable, don't know for sure
jeffH: if you have discoverable credentials, and share that ID, you can look it up
selfissue: I read it and approved
it.
... it was bettre than what we had before.
jeffH: maybe we should continu discussion in the issue and PR
tony: target is still wd-03
jeffH: yes
... we can punt, it has come up on the CTAP side. think best to
get it writteen down
tony: move to issues
tonuy: all the current issues are puntable
tony: we could agree to punt to
next level and turn out wd-03 or wait
... and address them now. along with thee 2 PRs that we
have
agl: we were hoping for Apple to bring attestation.
jbradley: they are saying they are stretched, they will try for next week.
tony: can people review #1452
this week for next week and see what happens with apple
... may next week, if Apple not here, we can decide to produce
a WD-03
... it is your decision
... hold up for #1452 and look at it next week.
... any other issues.
?
jeffH: apple is attestation format.
tony: they have introduced an
attestation.
... would hope to have it in wd-04, that should be last
WD.
... so the sooner the better on this one.
jeffH: I just submitted an issue
for attestation, https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1453
... I will update
tony: AOB
This is scribe.perl Revision of Date Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Present: selfissued jfontana wseltzer jbarclay nsteele No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: jfontana Inferring Scribes: jfontana WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found. Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webauthn/2020Jul/0056.html WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth WARNING: No date found! Assuming today. (Hint: Specify the W3C IRC log URL, and the date will be determined from that.) Or specify the date like this: <dbooth> Date: 12 Sep 2002 People with action items: WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found! Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>. Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of new discussion topics or agenda items, such as: <dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]