W3C

- DRAFT -

Web Authentication WG

17 Jun 2020

Attendees

Present
wseltzer, jfontana, agl, akshay, bill, davidwaite, dturner, elundberg, jeffh, jeremyerickson, nadalin, selfissued, nsteele, nina, rae, sbweeden, jbarclay
Regrets
Chair
Nadalin, Fontana
Scribe
jfontana

Contents


tony: we did find out during Virtual TPAC week , we will not have our normal call
... WG will not meet that week

Wendy: upon further discussion we will try to replicate the un-conference that is usually on wed.
... more information will come from W3C. when better picture of schedule.

https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1402

tony: any updates.

agl: I think this is the fight API for the web

tony: elundburg can you do review.

elundberg: yes

https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1424

agl: wait for john to see and emil

https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1439

agl: good to go.

tony: any objections to merge

no

https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1440

elundberg: want review from selfissue on this.

selfissue: I will look at it. I want to understand why we want to use CDDL

elundberg: we need it with some extensions.

selfissue: this is case where we translate JS data structure to CBOR; need to be consistent

elundberg: I was working an #1425, i wanted some way to fully define data structure
... this is for authenticator inputs.

selfissue: i will look

nics: nothing on transport. will wait for caBLE to land

https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1406

jeffH: I will create a PR. We need to get CTAP stuff wrapped up

https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1441

jeffH: signature formats, yes. everything is explained here.
... some good points have been made in the issue.
... seems underspecified, reviewer is saying

tony: we need more comments

jeffH: addressing this is not hard, just need time.

tony: who wants to take lead.

jeffH: what is the priority?

selfissue: assign it to me.

https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1442

tony: this needs triage

nick2: I can take this one

tony: not issue with spec, need to answer question

elundberg: maybe change some wording.

tony: anything else?
... adjourn

rrsagent: make logs public

rrsagent: draft minutes

* web page updated with minutes

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

[End of minutes]

Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version (CVS log)
$Date: 2020/06/17 19:26:03 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision of Date 
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/tony we/tony: we/
Default Present: wseltzer, jfontana, agl, akshay, bill, davidwaite, dturner, elundberg, jeffh, jeremyerickson, nadalin, selfissued, nsteele, nina, rae, sbweeden
Present: wseltzer jfontana agl akshay bill davidwaite dturner elundberg jeffh jeremyerickson nadalin selfissued nsteele nina rae sbweeden jbarclay
No ScribeNick specified.  Guessing ScribeNick: jfontana
Inferring Scribes: jfontana

WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found.


WARNING: No date found!  Assuming today.  (Hint: Specify
the W3C IRC log URL, and the date will be determined from that.)
Or specify the date like this:
<dbooth> Date: 12 Sep 2002

People with action items: 

WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found!  
Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>.

Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of 
new discussion topics or agenda items, such as:
<dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report


WARNING: IRC log location not specified!  (You can ignore this 
warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain 
a link to the original IRC log.)


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]