<kaz> scribenick: jennifer
McCool: Reviewing minutes from last time.
<kaz> June-2
<inserted> (minutes approved)
McCool: Talking about the talk archival
<kaz> scribenick: kaz
<Zakim> dape, you wanted to move talks/presenations to marketing repo?
Daniel: wondering if we want to to move the resources on talks/presentations to the wot-marketing repo
<jennifer> https://github.com/w3c/wot/tree/master/PRESENTATIONS
Kaz: do we want to make a resolution about that here? or maybe during the next marketing call on Thursday?
McCool: yeah, that's a marketing
topic
... let's talk about the ACIOA talk now
McCool: plan A is updating the above
slides on Smart City with the results of PlugFest
... and plan B is using them as is
Jennifer: think I have some more slides to
be added
... possibly centralized approach vs distributed approached, or
combination
McCool: Daniel, any ideas?
scribenick: jennifer
Daniel: Trying to find a good solution on how to manage actions
scribenick: kaz
McCool: (adds some comments to the
issue)
... (mentioning potential security concerns)
<inserted> McCool's comment to Issue 899
scribenick: jennifer
Daniel: The downside of having static TDs is that you cannot know what actions are currently running
scribenick: kaz
Kaz: we need to clarify concrete use case scenario and requirements for this topic
Jennifer: btw, should we talk about the
topics on prototyping during the PlugFest calls? Or OK to talk
about them here during the PoC calls?
... e.g., Python implementations and Geolocation services
... we could get geolocation information using Web APIs via Web
browsers
McCool: (adding those topics as "special
topics (future)" to the agenda of this PoC call)
... Python support for WoT
... Geolocation - Fugu?
Kaz: basically, you can bring any kind of your
work to this PoC call
... and if you're interested in bringing some of the ideas and
implementations to the PlugFest, you can do so
McCool: (adds a note on python support:
for robotics ues cases and AI use cases)
... regarding Geolocation
... beyond GPS - indoor use cases
... wifi triangulation, SLAM, etc.
Kaz: we need to consider the level of "geolocation information", outside, inside of a building, within a room, etc.
McCool: right
Jennifer: well take a look
McCool: would like to include LinkSmart
approach
... any update on the cloud instance?
Farshid: some minor update but no major
changes
... can easily enable the access for you all
McCool: ok
... you could accept several passwords. right?
Farshid: yes
... can keep the credential information on a page
McCool: can you post the account/password to the WoT Members list?
Farshid: (mentions how to handle the tokens)
McCool: think directory is a good use
case for dynamic APIs
... we need to look into the Open API spec
... as part of the dynamic API proposal
Daniel: yes
McCool: cancelled for June 16, 23 and
30
... next meeting will be July 7 for Smart City
... any idea for that meeting?
... use case review
... geolocation
Jennifer: we'll figure out what the best way to manage the data, centralized or not
McCool: several issues here
... campus use case, spatial queries
... static geolocation information within TD
... and possibly spatial query via the directory
... also how to handle tokens for security
... LinksSmart implementation supports several possible flows
Jennifer: good points about geolocation information
McCool: let's continue the discussion
during the next call on July 7
... (adds some more points to the agenda)
[adjourned]