W3C

- DRAFT -

Personalization Task Force Teleconference

16 Mar 2020

Attendees

Present
CharlesL, becky, LisaSeemanKest, JF, Roy_, janina
Regrets
Chair
SV_MEETING_CHAIR
Scribe
sharon

Contents


<LisaSeemanKest> scribe: sharon

TAG response https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/476

<LisaSeemanKest> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/476

Lisa: Wrote back they do not understand it because it is not in the template.

<LisaSeemanKest> ACTION: john to adress tag responce restucture the explainer

<trackbot> Created ACTION-45 - Adress tag responce restucture the explainer [on John Foliot - due 2020-03-23].

<Roy_> https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/blob/master/explainer-tag/explainer.md

<LisaSeemanKest> close item 3

Roy: Created an explainer template in GitHub. You can edit or create a new one.

<LisaSeemanKest> https://html-online.com/editor/

iternationlization https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/issues/133#issuecomment-595502408

Lisa: Response from internationalization. Does anyone want to review and respond?

JF: Symbols are similar to sign language. Each symbol set has its on kind of grammer. Bliss is just a master record so we use their number.
... Provision of the symbols is determined by the user.
... Symbol can then be rendered for whatever the end user system is supporting we support.

Charles: We can do this via email.

<LisaSeemanKest> action, becky respond to internationalize issue https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/issues/133

<LisaSeemanKest> ACTION: Becky respond to internationalize issue https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/issues/133

<trackbot> Created ACTION-46 - Respond to internationalize issue https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/issues/133 [on Becky Gibson - due 2020-03-23].

Go through the list of Open issues for Explainer & Module 1 https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/labels/content%20module

Lisa: Should I send a list of issues via email and then close a bunch of them?

Charles: If they are done mark as closed.
... 3 issues that have not been assigned. Issue 125 is clean up to match harmonization.
... Sharon can do 125 and the other 2 from Sam may need to be discussed by the group.

John: We are working from the assumption that the user has a symbol set installed.

Charles: Then its up to the AT to make that transformation.

<JF> ACTION: JF to respond to Issue 76 - https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/issues/76

<trackbot> Created ACTION-47 - Respond to issue 76 - https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/issues/76 [on John Foliot - due 2020-03-23].

Lisa: 65 and 47, we think we addressed it in the new draft and provide a link.
... Do you still feel 47 is relevant or can it be closed?

John: Close 47

Charles: Issue #42 also has John's name.

<JF> ACTIONS?

<JF> ACTION: JF to respond to https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/476

<trackbot> Created ACTION-48 - Respond to https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/476 [on John Foliot - due 2020-03-23].

<CharlesL> https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/issues/42

Charles: You were also assigned issue 42.

<JF> ACTION: JF to finalize https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/issues/42

<trackbot> Created ACTION-49 - Finalize https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/issues/42 [on John Foliot - due 2020-03-23].

<CharlesL> https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/issues/74

JF: Respond to Sam by asking him to review our current modules to see if it addresses his concerns.

Lisa: Issue 65 regarding duplicates... it was separated to 67 and 65. It looks we think we handled it. Do you agree?

Charles: We did this with the sorted table and removed duplicates. This work is done. We removed any duplicates and renamed when appropriate.
... He'll add a link to the sortable table in issue 65.
... Issue 128 we need to track the person down and get a link to the code.

<LisaSeemanKest> issue #65 and #47 - i want to write: Thank you so much for your comment. We think the new draft has adressed it . See https://www.w3.org/TR/personalization-semantics-content-1.0/. please open a new issue if

<LisaSeemanKest> for https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/issues/4 i think we can say we did the ping review - let us know if there are more concerns

<LisaSeemanKest> thank u john!

Summary of Action Items

[NEW] ACTION: Becky respond to internationalize issue https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/issues/133
[NEW] ACTION: JF to finalize https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/issues/42
[NEW] ACTION: JF to respond to https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/476
[NEW] ACTION: JF to respond to Issue 76 - https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/issues/76
[NEW] ACTION: john to adress tag responce restucture the explainer
 

Summary of Resolutions

[End of minutes]

Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.154 (CVS log)
$Date: 2020/03/16 15:02:46 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.154  of Date: 2018/09/25 16:35:56  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Present: CharlesL becky LisaSeemanKest JF Roy_ janina
Found Scribe: sharon
Inferring ScribeNick: sharon

WARNING: No meeting chair found!
You should specify the meeting chair like this:
<dbooth> Chair: dbooth

Found Date: 16 Mar 2020
People with action items: becky jf john respond

WARNING: IRC log location not specified!  (You can ignore this 
warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain 
a link to the original IRC log.)


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]