Steven: I'm giving an XForms tutorial, and a talk.
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2020Jan/0013
Steven: If we are going to combine refresh-done events, we need to agree where to listen
Erik: We dispatch to "The Document"
Steven: The root element in other words?
Erik: Conceptually yes
Steven: Well, the event does bubble, so we could say it is dispatched to some model, but if there is more than one model, you have to listen a level above
Erik: There is a problem if events are not combined, then you may get two events instead of one.
Steven: Hmm, true
... tricky
... sounds like we need to think about this a bit more.
Erik: It is not unreasonable to listen to events that are more global, the lifecycle of the processor. Refresh might qualify.
Steven: The only problem being that we don't have thay concept (yet). We talk in terms of models.
Alain: But it would be
useful.
... We talked about a form main element.
Steven: But we're not guaranteed
that it exists
... What if we said that refresh-done is dispatched to the
default model. Then you can listen there, or above since it
bubbles.
Erik: I'm happy with that.
Alain: OK with me.
Steven: So agreed.
<scribe> ACTION: Steven to add dispatch of refresh-done to default model.
<trackbot> Created ACTION-2272 - Add dispatch of refresh-done to default model. [on Steven Pemberton - due 2020-02-12].
and replace. [Erik]
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2020Feb/0000
Steven: So the action is done?
Erik: Yes.
Steven: Fine.
Close ACTION-2264
<trackbot> Closed ACTION-2264.
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2020Feb/0003
Steven: I added a single sentence description of each function. Please check you agree with my wording.
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2020Feb/0004
Erik: Many functions work like that in XPath. One benefit is this:
<ebruchez> you can write `/foo/bar/valid()`
Erik: Other examples in XPath
<ebruchez> https://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-functions-31/#func-data
Erik: In other words we are just
copying what XPath does
... it used not to be like that in XPath.
... it is a small convenience
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2020Feb/0002
Steven: Is there a reason we have
two different functions in this case, or is it an
oversight?
... all other cases use variable numbers of parameters
... I can't see a reason, and if not, then I propose combining
them.
Erik: Makes sense.
Alain: I'm not sure.
... XPath3 might make this difficult.
... having different names would be useful in this case.
Steven: In that case we leave it as-is.
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2019Jun/0014
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2019Oct/0012
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2019Oct/0008
Steven: No progress this week on these three.
[None]
[ADJOURN]
Steven: Next call 2 weeks.
... My birthday!
s;level;level;
s/\levellevel/
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.154 of Date: 2018/09/25 16:35:56 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/ one / a /./ Succeeded: s/Erik/Alain/ Succeeded: s/Steven/Erik/ Succeeded: s/givinf/giving/ Succeeded: s/don;t/don't/ Succeeded: s/SO the/So the/ Succeeded: s/FIne/Fine/ Succeeded: s/funtion/function/ FAILED: s/\/.level/level/ Succeeded: s|/.level|level| Succeeded: s|/.level|level| Succeeded: s|.level|level| Succeeded: s|/level|level| Succeeded: s|a /|a | Present: Alain Erik Steven Regrets: Philip No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: Steven Inferring Scribes: Steven Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2020Feb/0005 Found Date: 05 Feb 2020 People with action items: steven WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]