<inserted> scribenick: wseltzer
No meeting Feb 5
nsteele: we should be able to have dial-in for the F2F
nadalin: 909 on hold
    ... 966?
    ... 1300, 1330
jeffh: work in progress
nadalin: 1333
elundberg: please re-review
nadalin: 1353?
jcj_moz: I think I know how to implement this in FF
nadalin: jcj_moz should merge
    when complete
    ... 1354?
agl: awaiting John Bradley
nadalin: No untriaged PRs
nadalin: Untriaged
    ... 1356
elundberg: I don't think we can deliver without undermining privacy
agl: I'd be inclined to write a polite follow-up and close
nadalin: any objection?
https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1356
nadalin: 1358
https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1358
akshay: I'll report back on what
    edge does
    ... how many production servers are there with an IP
    address?
jcj_moz: if it's working in FF, that's a bug
akshay: agree it shouldn't be an option in production
jcj_moz: IP addresses aren't
    stable for certs or secure context
    ... if I file a bug, I'll link it in the issue
    ... I don't think we want to permit IPs
agl: they're not unique names
nadalin: 1362
elundberg: another request for the spec to do something different from what it does
jcj_moz: you answered the question re CBOR
[discussion whether CBOR is necessary for more than attestation]
jcj_moz: should be split into
    different concerns
    ... ArrayBuffer will get better, talk to WebIDL folks if you
    like
    ... but perhaps the CBOR is worth considering
agl: want to listen to web devs about things that could make their lives better
nadalin: should we close this and open up a new CBOR issue?
agl: I can do that
nadalin: other issues people want to discuss?
<inserted> scribenick: jfontana_
jcj_moz: nothing to talk about
tony: jeffH you will roll up #1360 CTAP
jeffH: yes
tony: #1436 is still blocked
<wseltzer> https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1294
<inserted> scribenick: wseltzer
nadalin: should we close, remove lightning?
Jiewen: sounds good
nadalin: see JBradley's last
    comment
    ... I'll see if I can get his agreement
agl: I'll craft a PR to remove it
<jfontana_> I can't get audio, but let's talk to john B before we scrap this
<jfontana_> please
nadalin: 1293
<jfontana_> OK, thanks. having connection issues.
https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1293
<inserted> scribenick: jfontana_
agl: changes this somewhat terrifies us.
tony: apple?
what do you think
we are on #1293
jcj_moz: this is potential for
    abuse here.
    ... can understand scary, but we need to move the ecosystem
    together
    ... think it shoujld apply to cross-origin iF
iframes
scribe: not wure how to make a
    value judgment
    ... i am more concern with cross origin iframes.
jiewen: i think this an issue, providing a system level UI,
jcj_moz: if you took over the
    screen...
    ... as you said this is how it works on Android
    presently.
    ... OK, think this is still valid issue.
agl: I think we should move
    together
    ... browser vendors
aksahy: need time to tihink in over
jcj_jones: would we split
    this?
    ... should we split this?
jcj_moz: let me look at what full-screen has done
agl: I think you will disappointed
tony: so we keep this as one.
jcj_moz: yes. should stay in level 2
agl: would input from the payments guy would be interesting here.
jeffH: they seem to want delegated authentication and they want to minimize interaction.
agl: dont' think they will get that
tony: OK. what do we want to do
    with #1147
    ... this is mainly an enterprise attestation.
    ... this is issue
    ... this is enterprise attestation. talk about it next
    week.
jeffH: it is in draft for CTAP2
tony: is this still blocked
agl: not in web authn
    ... our desire to have it in web authn is still there. I can
    craft up a PR for web auhtn
akshay: I think we should do that.
tony: and discuss next
    week.
    ... anything else to talk about?
    ... adjourn
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.154 of Date: 2018/09/25 16:35:56 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: i|jcj_moz: nothing|scribenick: jfontana_ Succeeded: i|No meeting Feb 5|scribenick: wseltzer Succeeded: i|should we close,|scribenick: wseltzer Succeeded: i|this somewhat terrifies|scribenick: jfontana_ Present: nsteele wseltzer akshay elundberg nadalin rmondello jcj_moz coffee agl jeffh nina christiaan Jiewen dwaite ketan jfontana jfontana_ Found ScribeNick: wseltzer Found ScribeNick: jfontana_ Found ScribeNick: wseltzer Found ScribeNick: jfontana_ Inferring Scribes: wseltzer, jfontana_ Scribes: wseltzer, jfontana_ ScribeNicks: wseltzer, jfontana_ WARNING: No date found! Assuming today. (Hint: Specify the W3C IRC log URL, and the date will be determined from that.) Or specify the date like this: <dbooth> Date: 12 Sep 2002 People with action items: WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]