<jfontana> is there a meeting?
<jfontana> I can't dial in
<jeffh> u on correct call # ?
<jfontana> tony: akshay, where do we stand.
<jfontana> akshay: we published yesterday.
<jfontana> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webauthn/2019Nov/0101.html
<jfontana> tony: #909 blcoked
<jfontana> https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1300
<jfontana> jeffH: no progress
<jfontana> https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1330
<jfontana> tony: still blocked
<jfontana> elundberg: yes
<jfontana> https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1333
<jfontana> elundberg: need more review.
<jfontana> tony: is alexei on
<jfontana> jeffH: no
<jfontana> ...we will see what we can do.
<jfontana> https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1342
<jfontana> tony: one jeff just opened.
<jfontana> jeffH: I think it is ready to go
<jfontana> ...I updated before the call
<jfontana> tony: Mike Jones, can you review
<jfontana> selfissue: #1342, PR
<jfontana> tony: that takes us through open PRs.
<jfontana> https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1343
<jfontana> tony: untriaged.
<jfontana> jeffH: need a milestone
<jfontana> ...having on-going discussions with security area director and IANA
<jfontana> ...repor for master branch incorporates feedback to date except for potentially becoming more prescriptive for duty of experts
<jfontana> ...need to talk about that with co-authors.
<jfontana> ...it is -04 and maybe -05
<jfontana> tony: create an IETF milestone we can put things on
<jfontana> https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1344
<jfontana> tony: who wants to look at this one. \
<jfontana> jeffh: I can do it
<jfontana> ...assign to me
<jfontana> nick: there a PR
<jfontana> jeffH: need to review it
<jfontana> tony: we should create a new PR and close this #1344
<jfontana> ...I will close this one and assign another
<jfontana> jeffH: #1345 does the same thing.
<jfontana> jcj_moz: I don't think it matters either way.
<jfontana> tony: do the same with the next one. then. #1350
<jfontana> https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1350
<jfontana> akshay: this is one reason I could not publish. let
<jfontana> ...let's merge
<jfontana> tony: that is the all the un-triaged
<jfontana> ...we have #1341
<jfontana> https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1341
<jfontana> tony: need to approve this one, there is typo, needs review
<jfontana> jeffH: I did
<jfontana> selfissue: i just approved and #1342
<jfontana> elundberg: I think we need the IPR for this one.
<jfontana> jcj_moz: but non-substantive change
<jfontana> tony: i don't want to take chances.
<jfontana> ...any more before we go to issues?
<jfontana> jcj_moz: I wanted to look at #1105
<jfontana> ...is there anything else you need from me.
<jfontana> jeffh: I don't think so.
<jeffh> nina satragno
<jfontana> Nina: the suggestion I am making comes with some changes.
<jfontana> jcj_moz: this would change to a new framework and adding a runner that can run them without automation tooling
<jfontana> nine: we would use test drive???? API
<jfontana> ...only when search automation
<jfontana> ..if not available don't do anything.
<jfontana> ...we don't need another runner
<jfontana> ...but need some support to existing one
<selfissued> Who is the person talking? They're just listed as Call-in user 3 (650253****).
<jfontana> nina satragno
<jfontana> google
https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/20481/files
<jfontana> thank you jcj-moz
<jfontana> jcj_moz: I will have to look at this. I am supportive of the whole effort
<jfontana> ...in next two months I will implement this in Firefox.
<jfontana> ...I don't want to stand in way of Chorumium
<jfontana> ... I want this to happen
https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/20162/files
<jfontana> nana: #2162, review this onie
<jfontana> correction: 20162
<jeffh> https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/20162
<jfontana> jcj_moz: I can come up with an opinion, but I don't have it now
<jfontana> tonhy: anything from Edge team
<jfontana> jcj_moz: I will start gecko work in jan.
<jfontana> ...I will have more opinions, and I need a run at this to make it work
<jfontana> https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1346
<jfontana> elundberg: this needs a fix.
<jfontana> ... on the none
<jfontana> jeffH: due to Web IDL change
<jfontana> ...webIDL , i think is correct
<jfontana> ...need to check
<jfontana> ...description may need to be updated.
<jfontana> elundberg: does that mean none is alias for empty list
<jfontana> jeffH: need to double check.
<jfontana> https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1347
<jfontana> jeffH: need to read this
<jfontana> tony: is ricky on the phone
<jfontana> ricky: yes
<jfontana> ...I can't speak for it right now. I will take a note
<jfontana> ...any comments.
<jfontana> jcj_moz: concern appears to be multiple prompts if user is using feature policy
<jfontana> ...I don't want to fix the problem and make it worse
<jfontana> ...we want to avoid double prompting.
<jfontana> tony: need to clarify use case.
<jfontana> https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1348
<jfontana> jcj_moz, I have to drop off at 15 minutes before top of hour. can you scribe from there?
<jfontana> elundberg: should browsers or authenticators as well, should they care about transport hints or ignore
<jfontana> akshay: think they are for authentication purpose
<jfontana> akshay: lets come back in a week
<jfontana> https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1349
<jfontana> akshay: not a spec issue a windows issue.
<scribe> scribenick: jcj_moz
<jfontana> *ok thanks
tony: Any other issues we want to
bring up?
... any issues that have been tagged for WD-03? I assume we're
still working through these and there haven't been progress,
would like to know if anyone would like to discuss any?
<<silence>>
emil: I'd like to bring back up
issue ....
... the one about using WebAuthn without Javascript
jcj_moz: Whyyyyyyy
emil: issue # 1255
jbradley: The Tor browser folks would be interested in this
jcj_moz: There was improvement to browser architecture when we removed keygen from the dom tree parsing
<<dicsussion about QUIC, the DOM, and WebAuthn outside of Javascript>>
tony: That concludes teh call
<< meeting ends >>
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.154 of Date: 2018/09/25 16:35:56 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Present: jeffh jcj_moz elundberg jfontana selfissued Found ScribeNick: jcj_moz Inferring Scribes: jcj_moz WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found. WARNING: No meeting title found! You should specify the meeting title like this: <dbooth> Meeting: Weekly Baking Club Meeting WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth WARNING: No date found! Assuming today. (Hint: Specify the W3C IRC log URL, and the date will be determined from that.) Or specify the date like this: <dbooth> Date: 12 Sep 2002 People with action items: WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found! Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>. Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of new discussion topics or agenda items, such as: <dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]