<jfontana> is there a meeting?

<jfontana> I can't dial in

<jeffh> u on correct call # ?

<jfontana> tony: akshay, where do we stand.

<jfontana> akshay: we published yesterday.

<jfontana> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webauthn/2019Nov/0101.html

<jfontana> tony: #909 blcoked

<jfontana> https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1300

<jfontana> jeffH: no progress

<jfontana> https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1330

<jfontana> tony: still blocked

<jfontana> elundberg: yes

<jfontana> https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1333

<jfontana> elundberg: need more review.

<jfontana> tony: is alexei on

<jfontana> jeffH: no

<jfontana> ...we will see what we can do.

<jfontana> https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1342

<jfontana> tony: one jeff just opened.

<jfontana> jeffH: I think it is ready to go

<jfontana> ...I updated before the call

<jfontana> tony: Mike Jones, can you review

<jfontana> selfissue: #1342, PR

<jfontana> tony: that takes us through open PRs.

<jfontana> https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1343

<jfontana> tony: untriaged.

<jfontana> jeffH: need a milestone

<jfontana> ...having on-going discussions with security area director and IANA

<jfontana> ...repor for master branch incorporates feedback to date except for potentially becoming more prescriptive for duty of experts

<jfontana> ...need to talk about that with co-authors.

<jfontana> ...it is -04 and maybe -05

<jfontana> tony: create an IETF milestone we can put things on

<jfontana> https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1344

<jfontana> tony: who wants to look at this one. \

<jfontana> jeffh: I can do it

<jfontana> ...assign to me

<jfontana> nick: there a PR

<jfontana> jeffH: need to review it

<jfontana> tony: we should create a new PR and close this #1344

<jfontana> ...I will close this one and assign another

<jfontana> jeffH: #1345 does the same thing.

<jfontana> jcj_moz: I don't think it matters either way.

<jfontana> tony: do the same with the next one. then. #1350

<jfontana> https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1350

<jfontana> akshay: this is one reason I could not publish. let

<jfontana> ...let's merge

<jfontana> tony: that is the all the un-triaged

<jfontana> ...we have #1341

<jfontana> https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1341

<jfontana> tony: need to approve this one, there is typo, needs review

<jfontana> jeffH: I did

<jfontana> selfissue: i just approved and #1342

<jfontana> elundberg: I think we need the IPR for this one.

<jfontana> jcj_moz: but non-substantive change

<jfontana> tony: i don't want to take chances.

<jfontana> ...any more before we go to issues?

<jfontana> jcj_moz: I wanted to look at #1105

<jfontana> ...is there anything else you need from me.

<jfontana> jeffh: I don't think so.

<jeffh> nina satragno

<jfontana> Nina: the suggestion I am making comes with some changes.

<jfontana> jcj_moz: this would change to a new framework and adding a runner that can run them without automation tooling

<jfontana> nine: we would use test drive???? API

<jfontana> ...only when search automation

<jfontana> ..if not available don't do anything.

<jfontana> ...we don't need another runner

<jfontana> ...but need some support to existing one

<selfissued> Who is the person talking? They're just listed as Call-in user 3 (650253****).

<jfontana> nina satragno

<jfontana> google

https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/20481/files

<jfontana> thank you jcj-moz

<jfontana> jcj_moz: I will have to look at this. I am supportive of the whole effort

<jfontana> ...in next two months I will implement this in Firefox.

<jfontana> ...I don't want to stand in way of Chorumium

<jfontana> ... I want this to happen

https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/20162/files

<jfontana> nana: #2162, review this onie

<jfontana> correction: 20162

<jeffh> https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/20162

<jfontana> jcj_moz: I can come up with an opinion, but I don't have it now

<jfontana> tonhy: anything from Edge team

<jfontana> jcj_moz: I will start gecko work in jan.

<jfontana> ...I will have more opinions, and I need a run at this to make it work

<jfontana> https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1346

<jfontana> elundberg: this needs a fix.

<jfontana> ... on the none

<jfontana> jeffH: due to Web IDL change

<jfontana> ...webIDL , i think is correct

<jfontana> ...need to check

<jfontana> ...description may need to be updated.

<jfontana> elundberg: does that mean none is alias for empty list

<jfontana> jeffH: need to double check.

<jfontana> https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1347

<jfontana> jeffH: need to read this

<jfontana> tony: is ricky on the phone

<jfontana> ricky: yes

<jfontana> ...I can't speak for it right now. I will take a note

<jfontana> ...any comments.

<jfontana> jcj_moz: concern appears to be multiple prompts if user is using feature policy

<jfontana> ...I don't want to fix the problem and make it worse

<jfontana> ...we want to avoid double prompting.

<jfontana> tony: need to clarify use case.

<jfontana> https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1348

<jfontana> jcj_moz, I have to drop off at 15 minutes before top of hour. can you scribe from there?

<jfontana> elundberg: should browsers or authenticators as well, should they care about transport hints or ignore

<jfontana> akshay: think they are for authentication purpose

<jfontana> akshay: lets come back in a week

<jfontana> https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1349

<jfontana> akshay: not a spec issue a windows issue.

<scribe> scribenick: jcj_moz

<jfontana> *ok thanks

tony: Any other issues we want to bring up?
... any issues that have been tagged for WD-03? I assume we're still working through these and there haven't been progress, would like to know if anyone would like to discuss any?

<<silence>>

emil: I'd like to bring back up issue ....
... the one about using WebAuthn without Javascript

jcj_moz: Whyyyyyyy

emil: issue # 1255

jbradley: The Tor browser folks would be interested in this

jcj_moz: There was improvement to browser architecture when we removed keygen from the dom tree parsing

<<dicsussion about QUIC, the DOM, and WebAuthn outside of Javascript>>

tony: That concludes teh call

<< meeting ends >>

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.154  of Date: 2018/09/25 16:35:56  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Present: jeffh jcj_moz elundberg jfontana selfissued
Found ScribeNick: jcj_moz
Inferring Scribes: jcj_moz

WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found.


WARNING: No meeting title found!
You should specify the meeting title like this:
<dbooth> Meeting: Weekly Baking Club Meeting


WARNING: No meeting chair found!
You should specify the meeting chair like this:
<dbooth> Chair: dbooth


WARNING: No date found!  Assuming today.  (Hint: Specify
the W3C IRC log URL, and the date will be determined from that.)
Or specify the date like this:
<dbooth> Date: 12 Sep 2002

People with action items: 

WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found!  
Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>.

Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of 
new discussion topics or agenda items, such as:
<dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report


WARNING: IRC log location not specified!  (You can ignore this 
warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain 
a link to the original IRC log.)