I see no one else on call. Shall we wait 5 more minutes? Or start the meeting?
<Bert> Yes, it's just you and me so far.
<Bert> I'd say if nobody joins within 5 minutes, we'll cancel.
Okay. Rudy was hoping to have the terms discussed and accepted today.
I'm wary of doing that with just two people on the call.
<Bert> We're three now :-)
But we can send an email to the group for comments, and if none, accept them?
Yes, I see that Rudy has joined the call.
<Bert> Yes, we can do it by email, too. Send a message with a deadline and and nobody objects, it's accepted.
<Bert> Either Axel or me should send that message.
I think we can start the meeting, there are 4 people on call.
Bert: Approving minutes of last meeting
Bert: Any objections to accepting minutes from Oct-29 ?
Bert: (no objections) approved
Bert: For 12-Nov ?
Bert: (no objections) approved
<Bert> action-128?
<trackbot> action-128: Fajar Ekaputra to Will try to recollect all the inputs and (not-)addressed issues in the spec. -- due 2019-09-10 -- OPEN
Fajar: We can close the action as we have the spreadsheet
harsh: We can move the link to the Wiki
Bert: We can then close action-128
Action: bbos to add a link to the spreadsheet to the wiki, for safekeeping.
<trackbot> Created ACTION-138 - Add a link to the spreadsheet to the wiki, for safekeeping. [on Bert Bos - due 2019-12-03].
<Bert> close action-128
<trackbot> Closed action-128.
<Bert> action-131
<trackbot> action-131: Harshvardhan Pandit to Contact jan lindquis and inform them about the process how to suggest terms, i.e. ask them for a coherent proposal to extend our voacbulary to include their terms and let us know which ones are missing or where are the overlaps. -- due 2019-09-24 -- OPEN
<Bert> action-133
<trackbot> action-133: Harshvardhan Pandit to Fix the extra space in "dpv-nace: nace-code." in section 5 -- due 2019-10-22 -- OPEN
harsh: This was about terms from BIT - still ongoing
<Bert> close action-133
<trackbot> Closed action-133.
<Bert> action-134?
<trackbot> action-134: Fajar Ekaputra to Convert feedback from the spreadsheet into raised issues -- due 2019-11-05 -- OPEN
<Bert> open action-134
<Bert> action-135
<trackbot> action-135: Harshvardhan Pandit to Will make a formal proposal for an extension/modification in this direction. -- due 2019-11-19 -- OPEN
Fajar: Will raise them as issues
<Bert> close action-135
<trackbot> Closed action-135.
<Bert> close action-136
<trackbot> Closed action-136.
Bert: We have some existing subclasses of Behavior, are those applicable?
harsh: Some example?
Bert: Browsing Behavior?
Bert: Any objections to adopting proposal
Bert: (no objections) accepted
Resolved: Accept Harsh's proposal
harsh: There's a git patch in the email with the proposed changes
Bert: I will try integrating them
Action: bbos apply Harsh's patch to the HTML and RDF and republish, due 2019-11-28
<trackbot> Created ACTION-137 - Apply harsh's patch to the html and rdf and republish, due 2019-11-28 [on Bert Bos - due 2019-12-03].
<Bert> issue-14?
<trackbot> issue-14: We may want to add a non-normative comment in the spec that/how the taxonomy can be used as skos. -- open
Discussing issue-14 on call. No solutions so far.
<Bert> issue-16?
<trackbot> issue-16: Do we need to further structure consent notice? -- open
ISO 29184 online consent notices https://www.iso.org/standard/70331.html
ISO is currently looking at consent receipt as a standard
We can piggyback on whatever emerges to evaluate our consent vocab
Next meeting is on Dec-10 in 2 week, usual time slot
Succeeded: i/harsh: There's a git patch/Resolution: Accept Harsh's proposal https://www.w3.org/mid/1acfbf60-7631-eb90-77f9-af2bb9522194@harshp.com
Succeeded: i/Approving minutes/topic: Approve last two telcon minutes
Succeeded: i/action-128?/topic: Action items
Succeeded: i/Next meeting is /topic: Next meeting
Succeeded: s|Resolution: Accept Harsh's proposal https://www.w3.org/mid/1acfbf60-7631-eb90-77f9-af2bb9522194@harshp.com|Resolution: Accept -> Harsh's proposal https://www.w3.org/mid/1acfbf60-7631-eb90-77f9-af2bb9522194@harshp.com