W3C

- DRAFT -

Personalization Task Force Teleconference

11 Nov 2019

Attendees

Present
Becka11y, janina, CharlesL
Regrets
Chair
LisaSeemanKest
Scribe
becka11y, janina

Contents


<LisaSeemanKest> ageda+ distractions (becky's email ) at https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-personalization-tf/2019Oct/0022.html

<LisaSeemanKest> reminder we have a new password...

<Roy> https://www.w3.org/2017/08/telecon-info_personalization

<LisaSeemanKest> https://www.w3.org/2017/08/telecon-info_personalization

<LisaSeemanKest> scribe: becka11y

updates and security reviewhttps://w3ctag.github.io/security-questionnaire/#purpose

<janina> scribe: janina

ls: Charles took the task of starting our Security/Privacy survey
... We need to do it before we go to the TAG

<LisaSeemanKest> ACTION: charles to do security review https://w3ctag.github.io/security-questionnaire/#purpose

<trackbot> Created ACTION-20 - Do security review https://w3ctag.github.io/security-questionnaire/#purpose [on Charles LaPierre - due 2019-11-18].

<LisaSeemanKest> no quarum

<Roy> https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/task-forces/personalization/track/actions/open?sort=due

ls: Aslo, we need to check Explainer and make sure it's as complete as we can make it at this time

<LisaSeemanKest> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-personalization-tf/2019Oct/att-0021/00-part

roy: Have already reached out to I18N for review

ls: Good, we have considered I18N

<LisaSeemanKest> https://cdn.statically.io/gh/w3c/personalization-semantics/rewrite-prototype/content/index.html#values

ls; Both destination and distraction have chat, and they're different

ls: proposing to change destination to chatbot

bg: do we need to be morespecific? is it help? something else?
... recall an email about this

ls: it's a distraction when it comes up without your specific request
... distraction chat is good
... maybe chathelp?
... we should look also at help for the solution
... destination-help could be support?

bg: but could be many things.
... reads from her review on this

<Becka11y> becky’s review of distraction: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-personalization-tf/2019Oct/0022.html

bg: if there's a specific help chat do we also need it under destination?

ls: if they mean different things
... else not

[disambiguation discussion]

<Becka11y> proposal for distraction: An embedded interface to enable real-time interaction of text-based messages between a sender and a receiver. This includes chat that may have been initiated by the user or ones that appear without request.

ls: I can help with Help
... we can call destination help 'support'
... Loos further and finds more conflicts ... ...
... concludes we have two many

bg an action is a destination

<LisaSeemanKest> ?

<LisaSeemanKest> destination support A link to support or instructions.

<LisaSeemanKest> action help Opens a help function. (Implied simplification= "critical".)

<LisaSeemanKest> destination chat- remove

ls: moving on ...

<LisaSeemanKest> https://cdn.statically.io/gh/w3c/personalization-semantics/rewrite-prototype/content/index.html#values

<LisaSeemanKest> one was feedback

<LisaSeemanKest> reslved: language should be an action not destination

<LisaSeemanKest> defintion should be the same in both case, we can have a duplication for language of action and pourpose

<LisaSeemanKest> and use the defintion from action

<LisaSeemanKest> ability to select the prefered language for the content

<LisaSeemanKest> get rid of destination left and right

<LisaSeemanKest> but use the defintion in action - Changes the location of the selected item(s) to the left.

[discussion of whether/what can go on button vs link]

<LisaSeemanKest> add a destination next and prevoi=use with the same defintion as they have in action

ls: using common words is a good principle

<CharlesL> use Go to the next or previous instead of move.

distractions (becky's email ) at https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-personalization-tf/2019Oct/0022.html

<CharlesL> trackbot, end meeting

Summary of Action Items

[NEW] ACTION: charles to do security review https://w3ctag.github.io/security-questionnaire/#purpose
 

Summary of Resolutions

[End of minutes]

Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.154 (CVS log)
$Date: 2019/11/11 16:06:18 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.154  of Date: 2018/09/25 16:35:56  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/destionation/destination/
Default Present: Becka11y, janina, CharlesL
Present: Becka11y janina CharlesL
Found Scribe: becka11y
Found Scribe: janina
Inferring ScribeNick: janina
Scribes: becka11y, janina
Found Date: 11 Nov 2019
People with action items: charles

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


WARNING: IRC log location not specified!  (You can ignore this 
warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain 
a link to the original IRC log.)


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]