<LisaSeemanKest> https://raw.githack.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/pre---wide-review-module-1/content/index.html#simplification-explanation
<sharon> scribe: sharon
<Roy> https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/blob/pre---wide-review-module-1/content/index.html
<LisaSeemanKest> https://raw.githack.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/pre---wide-review-module-1/content/index.html#simplification-explanation
<CharlesL> https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/compare/pre---wide-review-module-1
charles: Review commits in Github since we can't see rendered view.
<LisaSeemanKest> https://raw.githack.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/pre---wide-review-module-1/explainer.html
charles: Action to change Help to
open help on the same page. Open in page and added open the
same page was added.
... Next change in destination. We renamed comment to feedback.
Now says submit feedback on the current item. There was a small
changes to the help function from includes changed to go
to.
Becky: Should we say navigates too?
<janina> +1 to Becky's point. More specificity would be good
Becky: If its on destination it implies a link which is navigation.
<scribe> ACTION: Charles Change destination help from go to navigates to.
<trackbot> Created ACTION-17 - Change destination help from go to navigates to. [on Charles LaPierre - due 2019-11-11].
<Becka11y> +1
Charles: Content distraction we
removed advertisement and added offer. "An offer or
advertisement of a product that is under the authors
control..."
... Content simplification example became examples
(plural).
... Reviewed examples for simplification critical. Might need
changes to the language. Use case is valid.
<janina> +1 to the proposed approach
Charles: Any objections or
comments?
... Changing definition of critical. Changing elements to
controls and content.
... Everyone OK with this change?
<Becka11y> +1
+1
<janina> +1
Charles: Same thing in medium and
low are the same change.
... Added hide timer in vocabulary. Provides a mechanism to
hide the count down clock in timed situations.
... That was moved and is not new. What we changed in helpful
vocabulary. Change Feedback to status. Any issues with
that?
Becky: What do we mean by immediate. What's right away?
Lisa: Gives feedback on the status that just happened.
Becky: Immediately identifies information of an action that just occurred?
<CharlesL> Current Definition: provides and identifies immediate information about any action that occurs.
<Becka11y> what about immediately provides and identifies information about an action that has just occured
Charles: Applies to any action. Notification is as soon as it happens.
Becky: Then take away the word just.
<CharlesL> Proposed Definition: immediately provides and identifies information about an action that has occurred.
Lisa: Can we have an example? We
may need it in the use cases.
... We don't have examples for all, but we do need a use cases.
COGA has a pattern but with name change people may not put the
two together.
<CharlesL> https://w3c.github.io/personalization-semantics/help/index.html
Charles: Look down to use cases.
There is nothing in there and it goes directly to vocabulary,
so we should add use cases.
... Help 3.1.3 was changed from feedback to status.
Becky: We addressed it because we had a duplicate, so we are changing it now.
Charles: Below extra help in
3.1.3. There is also valuable feedback that we will need to
tweak later.
... Single value of feedback was changed to status and the
definition we discussed.
<CharlesL> Proposed Definition: immediately provides and identifies information about an action that has occurred.
<scribe> ACTION: Charles to make the change in the help module.
<trackbot> Created ACTION-18 - Make the change in the help module. [on Charles LaPierre - due 2019-11-11].
Charles: Everyone Ok merging those changes to master branch?
Charles: Forgot to add that we wanted to do a tag review of the explainer in module 1 and review it to be sure we are all happy with it.
Janina: We should work the time line backward and get a tag review when we can. Will take it up with Michael. AP would request it.
Lisa: We discussed this on the coordination call. We need a tag review before we go to CR so there are no surprises. Its a good idea to look at it for next week to be sure we are happy with it.
Charles: Tag review should be inline with what is in the explainer.
<janina> https://w3ctag.github.io/explainers
<scribe> ACTION: Charles to compare the tags explainer requirements with out explainer and send an email to the list if discrepancies are found.
<trackbot> Created ACTION-19 - Compare the tags explainer requirements with out explainer and send an email to the list if discrepancies are found. [on Charles LaPierre - due 2019-11-11].
Lisa: We also have a requirements document that is much shorter. Is it Ok if it is at an earlier stage.
Janina: Where we need requirements are when we go from CR to PR.
<CharlesL> scribe: CharlesL
<Roy> https://statically.io/
<Roy> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-personalization-tf/2019Oct/0021.html
<Roy> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-personalization-tf/2019Oct/att-0021/00-part
Sharon: value of "chat" destination and distraction
<Roy> Sharon's email https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-personalization-tf/2019Oct/att-0021/00-part
<sharon> https://raw.githack.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/rewrite-prototype/content/index.html#values
<Roy> https://cdn.statically.io/gh/w3c/personalization-semantics/rewrite-prototype/content/index.html
Lisa: Chat-Link, or chat-region?
but we have data-distraction and data-destination
... open-chat for destination?
trackbot, end meeting
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.154 of Date: 2018/09/25 16:35:56 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/p13n-call// Succeeded: s/provided/provides/ Default Present: CharlesL, janina, Roy, Becka11y, LisaSeemanKest, John, Sharon Present: CharlesL janina Roy Becka11y LisaSeemanKest Sharon Regrets: John Found Scribe: sharon Inferring ScribeNick: sharon Found Scribe: CharlesL Inferring ScribeNick: CharlesL Scribes: sharon, CharlesL ScribeNicks: sharon, CharlesL Found Date: 04 Nov 2019 People with action items: change charles destination from go help WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option. WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]