<scribe> scribenick: ted
<scribe> Scribe: Ted
PatrickL: I object that we choose
base document from gut feeling without discussion as we left it
two weeks ago
... yes there is concensus
Peter: I was at the meeting where you discussed it two weeks ago but the consensus then and last week was towards to Gen2
Ulf: feeling is Gen2 adequately suits our needs
https://www.w3.org/auto/wg/wiki/Viws
Ted recap
[clarification of misunderstanding of minutes]
PatrickL: I was surprised the
pull request was merged last Tuesday as that is not sufficient
time to review
... at one point we agreed on seven days time for reviewing
pull requests
Ulf: I was in favor of accepting the major parts of of the pull request
PatrickL: I ask for more time for review and use the label Gen2
Ulf: absolutely
Ted: as we have not progressed since April, the group was eager to start moving forward again
PatrickL: it feels wrong how this happened and VW does not agree with merging this pull request as we did not have a chance to review it
Adnan: just wanted to understand the story behind the pull request. is the issue the duration of the pull request or content issue?
PatrickL: the first part, I wasn't aware of it for 11 days now
Peter: I forgot about a seven day
rule but if that is the case we can revert
... we also have issues on who can merge or label, repo
permissions
Ted: worked on repo issues, reviews those with permissions
Adnan: unsure if we need a full seven days and if you do not get any review, what then?
Peter: we should allow for review
and agree with Patrick
... if we have consensus on call that could expedite
Adnan: I went through a few of the open pull requests and some are quite stale, we need to make sure there is a max as well
Ted reviews conventions and will make sure conventions are sent in email with minutes and we should probably document on our wiki
Gunnar: not every person in group will want to review every pull request
Adnan: this is related to issue 306 and tied to 311
PatrickL: we should take
terminology from 306 and close it and bring findings of issue
into the document
... I would like to see the pull request