<jeanne> scribe: jeanne
<Lauriat> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/2019_September_16-20_in_Fukuoka,_Japan
SL: There is now a time-based
agenda outline, but we want to fill in what topics we will work
on when.
... we want to insure that people who have conflicts, like AC
meetings and people with remote access in the US/Canada.
... when do we want to talk about what topics?
Rachael: I will be attending remotely. I am more interested in Conformance in the morning.
Chuck: Conformance is a robust conversation and should be morning
Bruce: Conformance discussion is easier for remote participation
SL: Conformance in the JST
morning
... First topic will be How to Evaluate
... Monday morning first: Evaluating Conformance
... Monday 2 slot: Issues and Exceptions
... Tuesday 1 slot: Issues and Exceptions
... Tuesday 2 slot: Comparing Pros and Cons (if we get to
it)
... Content topics
... Monday 3 slot: Functional User needs
... Monday 4 slot: Building up tests
... Tuesday 3 slot: New content?
Jeanne: Are we ready to do new content? We haven't finished one SC to use a model
Rachael: I don't have a strong opinion, but it seems like it would be better to have a finished SC to use as a model
Jeanne: I propose dropping that topic for TPAC
Shawn: I would like to continue
"building up tests" because the first session will be
identifying the problem
... we have the Identifying Language prototype
... the second session will be about how to build up the tests
and make them easy to understand and use.
... one test with one set of outlines to evaluate
Jeanne: We have more examples than identifying language. We have some SC who have tests and methods sketched out.
SL: The last session to be the
Silver project plan.
... the project plan needs I plan to organize that outline into
something more sensible.
... it's part of a larger conversation with the chairs
... some will be working with the group
... we need to enroll people and track the work.
<Lauriat> Functional needs for sensory characteristics: https://github.com/w3c/silver/issues/71
<Lauriat> In the working outline: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aCRXrtmnSSTso-6S_IO9GQ3AKTB4FYt9k92eT_1PWX4/edit#heading=h.oks9pxyygjow
<Lauriat> From Charles' comment: "Copy and paste the ‘Benefits’ bullets (or ‘Intent’ statement when no Benefits provided) from each Understanding Doc; then edit the copy to convert disability-first or person-first language into functional needs. Then, add any functional needs that may be unique to the grouping of SC or any that may have been missed in the Understanding Docs."
<Lauriat> Example: Original benefit of 1.4.1: “Some older users may not be able to see color well.” Edited functional need: “Usage with limited color perception due to: human factors (like age); technical factors (like display quality); or contextual factors (like bright ambient light).”
<Lauriat> SC 1.2.2 Captions (Prerecorded), SC 1.2.4 Captions (Live), SC 1.2.6 Sign Language (Prerecorded): https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aCRXrtmnSSTso-6S_IO9GQ3AKTB4FYt9k92eT_1PWX4/edit#heading=h.fpeqlt9qnga1
<Lauriat> Functional needs for captions and sign language: https://github.com/w3c/silver/issues/70
<Chuck> scribe: Chuck
Jeanne: Trying to address
students with downs syndrom... <more detailed
reading>
... Lucy had comment "spoken words not audio"
Lauriat: I responded to that
one.
... People forget about captions for spans of silence is
essential.
... Otherwise you don't know there is silence.
Jeanne: I'll move that into the
definition of audio.
... Putting it in methods.
Lauriat: Cool.
... Next...
<Lauriat> Functional needs for alternative content for audio and video: https://github.com/w3c/silver/issues/69
Lauriat: Charles noted complete.
Having a look.
... <reads from content, on usages and needs>
... I needed a refresher. This was specifically looking at the
media alternatives. Rather than being specifically
caption...
... About alternative content. Functional user needs sounds
like preceding one.
Jeanne: The difference is the one Jan did was oriented towards sign language.
Lauriat: Also covered captioning.
Jeanne: Think these need to be merged?
Lauriat: Not sure. Part of
challenge is the functional user needs, I was thinking in terms
of for a specific context what does the user need to do?
... Context is very specific to video.
... Some of the usages at the high level are user needs. Would
be one to many relationship between them and the functional
groupings.
<jeanne> Lauriat: usage without vision will apply to just about everything we have here.
<jeanne> ... it's an unexpected direction
<jeanne> ... thoughts?
<jeanne> SL: My challenge is that the functional user needs are going into a higher level than anticipated. In the example of video content, the user needs are "usage without vision". I don't know that it is a bad approach, but I want to know the group input,
<jeanne> JohnK: What are examples of lower level?
<Lauriat> Example from captions & sign language: "Users cannot hear all or part of the audio component of movies and multimedia."
<jeanne> Jeanne: The section on Style NOtes for Functional Needs was what we talked about on Friday: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aCRXrtmnSSTso-6S_IO9GQ3AKTB4FYt9k92eT_1PWX4/edit#heading=h.wybvadozdbds
<jeanne> SL: The tests of functional needs that we will get into next week will necessarily get to a lower level.
<jeanne> SL: Back to the Media Alternative grouping:
<jeanne> ... there is another set of strikeout information and some overlapping information.
<Lauriat> Overlapping: "Usage with limited hearing or without hearing" and "Usage with limited vision or without vision and with limited hearing or without hearing."
<jeanne> ... Should we include intersectionality? We could end up having massive lists of intersections
<jeanne> jeanne: I think intersectionality should only be included when it has an inpact on the solution. For example, with captions, the needs of people with hearing loss are different from the needs of hearing and vision loss.
<jeanne> SL: I think we should call this one not fully reviewed.
<jeanne> ... we have asked for Remote participation WebEx links and will post them when we get them.
<jeanne> SL: Reminder that we will not have regular phone meetings on the week of 16-20 September. Instead we will be having the all-day TPAC F2F meeting
<jeanne> rrsgaent, make minutes
<jeanne> trackbot, end meeting
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.154 of Date: 2018/09/25 16:35:56 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/ok// Succeeded: s/thx// Succeeded: s/present?// Default Present: Chuck, jeanne, Bruce, Makoto, johnkirkwood, Rachael, Shawn WARNING: Replacing previous Present list. (Old list: jeanne, janina, Chuck, AngelaAccessForAll, shari, CharlesHall, pkorn, KimD, Lauriat, bruce_bailey) Use 'Present+ ... ' if you meant to add people without replacing the list, such as: <dbooth> Present+ Present: Chuck jeanne Bruce Makoto johnkirkwood Rachael Shawn Regrets: Janina Charles Jan Found Scribe: jeanne Inferring ScribeNick: jeanne Found Scribe: Chuck Inferring ScribeNick: Chuck Scribes: jeanne, Chuck ScribeNicks: jeanne, Chuck Found Date: 10 Sep 2019 People with action items: WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]