W3C

– DRAFT –
DXWG plenary July 16 2019

16 July 2019

Attendees

Present
alejandra, annette_g, antoine, DaveBrowning
Regrets
Peter Winstanley
Chair
Karen Coyle
Scribe
antoine

Meeting minutes

<kcoyle> agenda https://‌www.w3.org/‌2017/‌dxwg/‌wiki/‌Meetings:Telecon2019.07.16

Admin

<kcoyle> https://‌www.w3.org/‌2019/‌07/‌09-dxwg-minutes

Proposed: accept minutes of last week

<kcoyle> proposed: approve minutes of July 9

<DaveBrowning> +1

+1

<kcoyle> +1

<annette_g> +1

Resolved: approve minutes of July 9

PRs due to closing

kcoyle: there is progress

Profile definition

kcoyle: the results of the poll are in

https://‌www.w3.org/‌2002/‌09/‌wbs/‌99375/‌profile-def/‌results

kcoyle: we need to record what is in the mail in the minutes

<kcoyle> https://‌lists.w3.org/‌Archives/‌Public/‌public-dxwg-wg/‌2019Jul/‌0356.html

antoine: there is one objection

kcoyle: yes but there is quite some consensus otherwise.
… Peter has discussed it with Philippe
… and they came with the idea of writing a note
… to reflect the discussion
… in its full range
… This is very recent (this morning)

antoine: would it be a formal note, or a "note" as in a piece of text what could be included in another document (like the Profile Guidance)?

kcoyle: I think they mentioned a formal W3C Note but the suggestion to put it in the Guidance would save a lot of overhead
… so I'll mention the suggestion to Peter

alejandra: antoine's proposal would make a lot of sense, also fitting what we though the Profile Guidance would do.

kcoyle: what Peter and I can do is outline the text, put it somewhere so that people can look and judge.

antoine: in any case, some of what Rob said would end up in the Guidance, as an extension/recommendation of what profiles are

kcoyle: yes

https://‌github.com/‌w3c/‌dxwg/‌issues/‌989

(is the comment that could lead to additions of Rob's material in the Guidance)

Resolved: accept definition of profile as shown in https://‌lists.w3.org/‌Archives/‌Public/‌public-dxwg-wg/‌2019Jul/‌0356.html

DCAT

DaveBrowning: most of what happened is editorial
… the few mentioned in the agenda are the most important
… especially 988
… there has been discussion that lead to action.
… the geospatial people seemed to be happy
… Then there are issues synchronizing the Turtle file
… our aim is to be finished by the end of the month

kcoyle: the meeting with Philippe is on 31 July
… do you think there can be issues?

DaveBrowning: I think we will be ok. Nothing that should explode in our face.

kcoyle: is there something with the use of the word "represents"?

DaveBrowning: I'll make sure we put it on the agenda for tomorrow.

kcoyle: there is nobody involved in Conneg. There is some work taking place but we'd need to check schedule for 3PWD

Summary of resolutions

  1. approve minutes of July 9
  2. accept definition of profile as shown in https://‌lists.w3.org/‌Archives/‌Public/‌public-dxwg-wg/‌2019Jul/‌0356.html
Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by Bert Bos's scribe.perl version Mon Apr 15 13:11:59 2019 UTC, a reimplementation of David Booth's scribe.perl. See history.

Diagnostics

Maybe present: kcoyle, Proposed