RRSAgent: please make logs public
RRSAgent: please draft minutes v2
+1
<roba_> proposed confirm minutes https://www.w3.org/2019/05/23-dxwgcneg-minutes
<roba_> +1
+1 (except that Nick was there)
<roba_> noting ncar was present
Resolved: confirm minutes https://www.w3.org/2019/05/23-dxwgcneg-minutes
https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/products/4
action-193?
<trackbot> action-193: Rob Atkinson to Move jmeter test suite to within w3c systems -- due 2018-09-05 -- OPEN
roba_: there has been some progress on the test suite
… haven't got a working implementation of the header-based
<roba_> re 193 - got a test suite for QSA implementation - need a working example of a header based implementation.
roba_: implementation to work against
action-327?
<trackbot> action-327: Peter Winstanley to Get w3c to announce conneg pwd2 -- due 2019-05-21 -- OPEN
roba_: tHE blog post has been written
… so we can close the action
close action-327
<trackbot> Closed action-327.
action-328?
<trackbot> action-328: Rob Atkinson to Draft replies to tom's email in a new gh issue -- due 2019-05-23 -- PENDINGREVIEW
roba_: is on the agenda, will take care of that later
action-329?
<trackbot> action-329: Peter Winstanley to Check if an announcement has been made to public comments list -- due 2019-05-28 -- OPEN
LarsG: should be an topic for the plenary
roba_: I'll ask Peter in next week's plenary
… also about action-330
roba_: kc has sent LarsG an email regarding the connection between IETF and W3C docs
… understanding is that the IETF will be updated to reflect W3C definition
LarsG: The main point is that the IETF definition has to be at least as broad as the W3C def
… otherwise we'll have semantic insecurity whether the IETF work can be used for W3C purposes
… since we don't know if the IETF definition covers the W3C understanding
… if it W3C definition is broader than the IETF one
roba_: we need to make sure that the W3C definition is covered by the IETF one
… that means that we need to look at the process
Action: LarsG to respond to query re IETF process
<trackbot> Created ACTION-340 - Respond to query re ietf process [on Lars G. Svensson - due 2019-06-27].
roba_: was asked to come back to the subgroup and assess a timeline for 3PWD
roba_: we should look at open issues and see where we are
… suggest that we set July 31 as a target timeframe to get 3pwd ready
LarsG: +1
<roba_> +1
LarsG: suggest that each of the participants look at the assigned issues
… and then we reconvene next week and see how far we've got
roba_: +1
roba_: provided the document as promised
LarsG: I need to look at that and get back
roba_: OK, so LarsG will review and answer Tom
Action: LarsG to do final review and reply to Tom formally
<trackbot> Created ACTION-341 - To final review and reply to tom formally [on Lars G. Svensson - due 2019-06-27].
roba_: and do any necessary feedback loops
adjourned
Succeeded: s/to final review/do final review/
Maybe present: roba_, RRSAgent