– DRAFT –
DXWG Weekly Plenary

<TomB> TomB is IRC-only

agenda

<PWinstanley> proposed: agree https://‌www.w3.org/‌2019/‌05/‌07-dxwg-minutes

<PWinstanley> 0 -not there

<DaveBrowning> +1

proposed: accept the last minutes

+1

<AndreaPerego> 0 (was not there)

<SimonCox> +1

Resolved: agree https://‌www.w3.org/‌2019/‌05/‌07-dxwg-minutes

Resolved: agree https://‌www.w3.org/‌2019/‌05/‌07-dxwg-minutes

outstanding PRs - for information

PWinstanley: there a couple of pr

PWinstanley: I would like to remind that we have to show that the CONNEG document are reviwed

any suggestion on how we can make a big noise on that

in particular with conneg last wd

PWinstanley: what we need are feedback that can be shown

SimonCox: is there an announce that can be used as anchor for asking feedback

Next steps with DCAT

PWinstanley: I sent a poll for dcat

<SimonCox> re PWD of conneg - I would expect to see an announcment here https://‌www.w3.org/‌blog/‌news/

<SimonCox> ... but nothing !

<AndreaPerego> Poll here: https://‌www.w3.org/‌2002/‌09/‌wbs/‌99375/‌DCAT_PR/

Action: PWinstanley to get W3C to announce conneg PWD2

<trackbot> Created ACTION-327 - Get w3c to announce conneg pwd2 [on Peter Winstanley - due 2019-05-21].

PWinstanley: is there anything else you think we should do for creating a bigger splash about the conneg wd

PWinstanley: we mentioned the poll about dcat

PWinstanley: we have a certain number of evidence coming from profile, are there other implementation evidence people are aware of?

SimonCox: we have a tab somewhere, could anyone put it in the irc?

<DaveBrowning> Github transition: https://‌github.com/‌w3c/‌transitions

DaveBrowning: there is also a github issues

DaveBrowning: most of the section we should provide we have already it is mainly a matter of cut and paste

PWinstanley: at the moment we are waiting for the poll then we we have to prepare the transition document

<AndreaPerego> Spreadsheet to collect implementation evidence: https://‌docs.google.com/‌spreadsheets/‌d/‌1eEVUuPFAGO2GjS5ocxylY8T1AlpqlwnOTc3er_Mhcv4/‌edit?usp=sharing

PWinstanley: what are the things you ( dave) want the people do ?

DaveBrowning: we got some editorial work, including the pr andrea is preparing

PWinstanley: what we want is to have period in which people can say what they think having the document freezed

PWinstanley: is there anything the people want to discuss on the respect of dcat ?

<DaveBrowning> DaveBrowning: We can probably hope to step back a bit once we have approval from the DXWG (the poll)

<DaveBrowning> ... then it may be quieter - need to be able to respond, but gathering implementation evidence

PWinstanley: is there any way we can partition the work in order to speed up the work which is left

<DaveBrowning> ... will be the largest element

SimonCox: do we have a time table ?

PWinstanley: I am going to work with philippe in order to have support and more instruction

PWinstanley: we can have a look at the work to be done on the subgroup tomorrow

SimonCox: One of the thing to clear is this idea of the evergreen specification which is new

DaveBrowning: I think simon's question is central

PWinstanley: i ask for clarification to philippe and make sure this revision ongoing process is not run and re-run

<SimonCox> 1. Is there a timetable 2. what is impact of plan to issue DCAT as an 'evergreen' recommendation

<SimonCox> 3. when do we apply for extension ...?

DaveBrowning: the evergreen process bluries the end of the group declared by the charter, but this aspect should be clearified

PWinstanley: is there anything we want to discuss?

PWinstanley: or we should close the meeting?

PWinstanley: shall we close the meeting?

PWinstanley: I will make some request to have publicity about the conneg to W3C

and tomorrow we can have a chat on dcat specifically

bye

<SimonCox> bye

<AndreaPerego> Bye