Wilco; I have not read comments from Shadi.
Shadi: I broke down the 3 generic tasks into individual steps.
... Thinking about questions - people need to be able to ask someone.
... Next step people need to confirm a persons send-in rule.
... Then we need to go to the AG with those discussions.
... Really my comment was just about breaking down Wilco's larger bullets into smaller steps. Building in some of the other comments.
... I came at it from a direction of being an unknown group reading this.
... I'm wondering if, in the beginning, the ACT Community Group takes more responsibility for filtering.
... Should this really kick-off in the future, and loads of people are suggesting rules, then we could break things into a filtering sub-group.
Wilco: That makes sense.
... Don't know the long term of all this. Where we are trying to get to in the next stage is to get more tool developers to run their tools against test cases.
Shadi: Committee you were referring to Alistair, that would be in the community group. If there are sufficient implementers.
Wilco: Back to agenda. Anything else to say about competing rules.
Wilco: ACT Rules community group have just launched a new website.
... Something revamped is the reporting area.
<Wilco> https://github.com/act-rules/testrunner
<Wilco> https://act-rules.github.io/rules/
<Wilco> https://act-rules.github.io/pages/implementations/testcases/
Wilco: Think about this more. There is a possible manageable process which has been run past Shadi.
... For every rule, there is an option to download JSON. With questions you then have to fill out.
Alistair: Is there more context.
Wilco: For automated we run test cases automatically. For manual you run it through some test procedures and record the end result.
... Audrey is up for trying this.
... Still looking for a volunteer who knows Trusted Tester.