Nadalin: No meeting Wednesday;
F2F Thursday next week
... No meeting IETF week (March 27)
plh: We're on-target for March
4
... any help we can find to eat our own dogfood and implement
WebAuthn on the W3C site
jfontana: We missed a few issues last week, 1105 and higher
duo_folks: we have some example libraries on webauthn.io
nadalin: 1105?
https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1105
scribe: do you believe it's a 1st draft or 2d draft issues?
jcj: kick it further down the road
nadalin: 02 then
... 1117?
elundberg: PR is open
... [underwater audio]
nadalin: 1122?
... leave it in 01
... 1123?
... PR open
... leave it at 01
elundberg: awaiting review from JC
jcj: I'll work on it
nadalin: 1125?
... close or postpone
elundberg: closure was suggested without objectoin
nadalin: closing
... 1128
elundberg: PR 1131
nadalin: doesn't limit us to FIDO
authenticators
... leave in 01
... 1133?
... not seeing immediate need
... any objection to moving it to 02?
... hearing none.
... 1146?
... leave at 01
... 1147?
elundberg: in what circumstances would you need this?
jcj: if we implemented at Moz,
we'd ignore unless pref were set to enterprise mode
... I don't fully understand
... keep pushing back on adding more attestation data
... we need Google to explain the vision of it
nadalin: leave it and discuss at
F2F
... 1135?
elundberg: technical. I think we can do it in 01
https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1135
elundberg: I was looking at the
wrong one.
... this one can be punted
nadalin: isn't this a question for SafetyNet, not our spec?
elundberg: that's what the issue
says. better just to refer
... this one is purely editorial
nadalin: 1146?
... already reviewed
... 1149?
elundberg: we can do in 01
nadalin: 1153? has a PR
open
... We've now triaged all L2-01 or 02
... PRs for L2-WD-01
https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1131
scribe: go ahead and merge
... 1143 needs review from JCJ
https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1143
scribe: 1159, editorial
https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1159
scribe: once it has ok from JCJ,
merge
... 1161 https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1161
... needs review
nadalin: that's the PRs
... one untriaged issue, 1162, new
elundberg: editorial answer,
"don't do that"
... intent of user verification is to verify user
nadalin: move it to 02
... any issues or PRs people would like to discuss today?
Nick: Nick and James from Duo will be at F2F. Would help to get definition of authenticators
nadalin: issue 1128?
Nick: describing authenticator for developers
nadalin: hearing nothing further,
adjourned.
... We'll send F2F agenda.
[adjourned]