– DRAFT –
Clreq Editors' Call
22 February 2019
xfq: #200 didn't fix #192 and #176
Eric: When two different proper nouns appear side-by-side, the underline SHOULD be broken between the two
… because MUST will be too difficult to implement
Bobby: I think it should be a MUST
Huijing: I also think it should be a SHOULD
Bobby: SHOULD then
… I'll take care of it
https://github.com/w3c/clreq/issues/189
Eric: I don't think #189 is about text layout
… it's about sorting
… I think OP should refer to CLDR
Huijing: I also don't think it's related to text layout
<ryukeikun> http://cldr.unicode.org
Eric: we can reply that it is out of the scope of clreq
https://github.com/w3c/clreq/pull/201
Bobby: Western text will not be horizontal-in-vertical
Eric: we can remove the "horizontal-in-vertical" part
xfq: I'll modify it
Yijun: we can also remove the "checkme"
https://github.com/w3c/clreq/pull/198
Eric: Perhaps we do not need an illustration here?
https://github.com/w3c/clreq/issues/96
xfq: fantasai added characters to skip for emphasis marks to the css-text-decor spec
Eric: In principle, we only add emphasis marks to Chinese characters
Bobby: We can look into this issue (for what characters should be skipped) before the next meeting
Bobby: emoji is an interesting case
… I think characters like "→" should not be skipped
Yijun: https://hackmd.io/0x9bBZbDSqyhSg5J-V_NsA
Bobby: <em>（這是一個「好」問題！）</em>
https://github.com/w3c/clreq/issues/114
Bobby: this is a complex issue
… we can look at #135 now
https://github.com/w3c/clreq/issues/135
Bobby: I think we can close this issue now
March 27, Wed, 19:00-20:00 (UTC+8)
Succeeded: s/Richard/xfq/
Succeeded: s/escaped/skipped/
Succeeded: s/[Xidorn left]//
Succeeded: s/I think it should refer to CLDR/I think OP should refer to CLDR/
Succeeded: s/to the css-text spec/to the css-text-decor spec/