<Wilco> https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/322/files
WF: let's start from the top
<Wilco> https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/322/files#r248633099
WF: editorial comment from Anne
<Wilco> https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/322/files#r248639865
Anne: can refer to WCAG 2.0 in addition to WCAG 2.1?
Shadi: just an example
Wilco: I think we mention 2.0 elsewhere in another example
Shadi: maybe open an issue to review the entire document for balance on 2.0/2.1 after CR publication?
Moe: will open that
Anne: meets expectations or the outcome is passed?
Wilco: meets expectations
Anne: disagree that outcomes are on page level
... each outcome is for a test target
... disagree with changing from outcome based on test target to entire test subject
SteinErik: surprised by some of the changes
... do not recall agreement on motion to make these changes
... have a hard time getting an overview on all these changes at once
Wilco: agreed, lots of changes
... following from discussion at TPAC
... decision was to have a fixed-set mapping
... "failed" always maps to "not satisfied"
<MoeKraft> https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/322.html#test-subject
Wilco: that consequence is that the outcome is for the test subject not for the individual test target
... this way we end up with a single outcome
... definition of outcome has been in the Editor Draft for a while now
<romain> makes me think of https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/issues/162
Anne: we continually changes bits and pieces, and lost overview
... my understanding was that testing on test target level
... need to check on that interpretation internally
Wilco: result for test targets cannot be inapplicable
... innapplicable only when no test targets are found
Shadi: maybe need more time to read the entire spec with all the changes, and understand any remaining issues
Alistair: I need to read through the entire document too
... think test subject would be entire page or such
... and test target to be part of that
... inapplicable would never be on an individual test target
... would imaging outcome for an entire test subject with pointers to individual test targets within that subject
https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/322/files#r248641230
Wilco: more consistency
Anne: suggest dropping the "list"
Wilco: fine with that
https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/322/files#r248642557
Wilco: just had that discussion, defered for now
https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/322/files#r248558884
Wilco: already have MUST requirement for that elsewhere
Shadi: then probably repetitive, can come back to that in editorial cleanup
https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/322/files#r248559417
Wilco: will fix
https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/322/files#r248645160
Wilco: will fix
https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/322/files#r248559730
Wilco: will fix
https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/322/files#r248559858
Wilco: external document is outside the scope of the spec, so not setting a requirement
https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/322/files#r248645454
Anne: editorial
Wilco: will look at it
https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/322/files#r248646224
Wilco: fair point, would be consistent with "applicability"
ShadI: could nest it in the rule structure
Wilco: agreed, will do that
Moe: already have an issue to restructure that section
Wilco: please everyone review in the next day or two
https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/322.html