W3C

Accessibility Conformance Testing Teleconference

17 Jan 2019

Attendees

Present
Anne, Alistair, Wilco, Shadi, Romain, Moe, MaryJo, Charu, SteinErik, Trevor
Regrets

Chair
MaryJo, Wilco
Scribe
Shadi

Contents


PR 322 https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/322

<Wilco> https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/322/files

WF: let's start from the top

<Wilco> https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/322/files#r248633099

WF: editorial comment from Anne

<Wilco> https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/322/files#r248639865

Anne: can refer to WCAG 2.0 in addition to WCAG 2.1?

Shadi: just an example

Wilco: I think we mention 2.0 elsewhere in another example

Shadi: maybe open an issue to review the entire document for balance on 2.0/2.1 after CR publication?

Moe: will open that

Anne: meets expectations or the outcome is passed?

Wilco: meets expectations

Anne: disagree that outcomes are on page level
... each outcome is for a test target
... disagree with changing from outcome based on test target to entire test subject

SteinErik: surprised by some of the changes
... do not recall agreement on motion to make these changes
... have a hard time getting an overview on all these changes at once

Wilco: agreed, lots of changes
... following from discussion at TPAC
... decision was to have a fixed-set mapping
... "failed" always maps to "not satisfied"

<MoeKraft> https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/322.html#test-subject

Wilco: that consequence is that the outcome is for the test subject not for the individual test target
... this way we end up with a single outcome
... definition of outcome has been in the Editor Draft for a while now

<romain> makes me think of https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/issues/162

Anne: we continually changes bits and pieces, and lost overview
... my understanding was that testing on test target level
... need to check on that interpretation internally

Wilco: result for test targets cannot be inapplicable
... innapplicable only when no test targets are found

Shadi: maybe need more time to read the entire spec with all the changes, and understand any remaining issues

Alistair: I need to read through the entire document too
... think test subject would be entire page or such
... and test target to be part of that
... inapplicable would never be on an individual test target
... would imaging outcome for an entire test subject with pointers to individual test targets within that subject

https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/322/files#r248641230

Wilco: more consistency

Anne: suggest dropping the "list"

Wilco: fine with that

https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/322/files#r248642557

Wilco: just had that discussion, defered for now

https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/322/files#r248558884

Wilco: already have MUST requirement for that elsewhere

Shadi: then probably repetitive, can come back to that in editorial cleanup

https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/322/files#r248559417

Wilco: will fix

https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/322/files#r248645160

Wilco: will fix

https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/322/files#r248559730

Wilco: will fix

https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/322/files#r248559858

Wilco: external document is outside the scope of the spec, so not setting a requirement

https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/322/files#r248645454

Anne: editorial

Wilco: will look at it

https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/322/files#r248646224

Wilco: fair point, would be consistent with "applicability"

ShadI: could nest it in the rule structure

Wilco: agreed, will do that

Moe: already have an issue to restructure that section

Next steps

Wilco: please everyone review in the next day or two

https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/322.html

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

[End of minutes]

Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.154 (CVS log)
$Date: 2019/01/17 15:10:23 $