– DRAFT –
Clreq Editors' Call
19 December 2018
https://github.com/w3c/clreq/pull/195
xfq: ready to merge?
All: agreed.
xfq: I'll also translate CONTRIBUTING.md
https://github.com/w3c/clreq/issues/42
Eric: Has this been fixed now?
Yijun: not yet
Eric: I'll unify the terms as described in the issue.
https://github.com/w3c/clreq/issues/56 & https://github.com/w3c/clreq/issues/57
Xidorn: We might want to ping r12a to see if he's ok with the explanation in the glossary
… if it's good enough we can bring it to § 2.3 The Type Area
Eric: the text in #57 was translated from jlreq § 2.2.2
… but the translation was unclear
xfq: both the Chinese and the English version is unclear
Yijun: I'll add proposed text as a comment in the issue
JLReq § 2.2.2 (en) -> https://www.w3.org/TR/2012/NOTE-jlreq-20120403/#basic_templates_of_page_formats
JLReq § 2.2.2 (ja) -> https://www.w3.org/TR/2012/NOTE-jlreq-20120403/ja/#basic_templates_of_page_formats
https://github.com/w3c/clreq/issues/90
https://github.com/bobbytung/Bopomofo_on_Web
Bobby: I haven't sorted out all of them yet
Eric: We should add it in a new appendix, as Appendix B
Yijun: We might want to add one for Pinyin as well, in the future
https://github.com/w3c/clreq/issues/103
Yijun: The previous version is correct according to the standard
… I should revert it to the previous version
https://github.com/w3c/clreq/issues/92
Bobby: This was discussed in TPAC 2015, about baseline calculation
Eric: Different fonts handle this differently
Bobby: I'll add some text description in the issue
https://github.com/w3c/clreq/issues/98
xfq: I don't see it in the English text now
Bobby: Western text uses U+2026 for ellipses
https://github.com/w3c/clreq/issues/110
Bobby: I think we've already fixed it
January 16, Wed, 19:00-20:00 (UTC+8)
Succeeded: s/jlreq § 2.2/jlreq § 2.2.2/
