<scribe> Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2018Dec/0003
[No link]
Steven: Still to have a call next
week?
... And then two weeks no call.
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2018Dec/0002
Steven: My proposal is in that email.
Erik: Should appearance be
'collapsible'?
... and something else for initial state.
... why @appearance?
... this means that the control changes @appearance on
receiving events.
... I agree that an open group looks different; I'm not
enthusiastic about using two appearances for the same
idea
... in other uses of @appearance, such as compact, it is for
the lifetime of the control.
Steven: Any ideas for how to give the initial state?
Erik: Any attribute will do tpo specify the state.
Steven: OK, I will choose one.
<scribe> ACTION: Steven to decide on attribute for initial state of appearance="collapse"
<trackbot> Created ACTION-2209 - Decide on attribute for initial state of appearance="collapse" [on Steven Pemberton - due 2018-12-19].
trackbot is creating a new ACTION.
<trackbot> Sorry, Steven, I don't understand 'trackbot is creating a new ACTION.'. Please refer to <http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc> for help.
trackbot Created ACTION-2208 - Decide on attribute for initial state of appearance="collapse" [on Steven Pemberton - due 2018-12-19].
<trackbot> Sorry, Steven, I don't understand 'trackbot Created ACTION-2208 - Decide on attribute for initial state of appearance="collapse" [on Steven Pemberton - due 2018-12-19].'. Please refer to <http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc> for help.
Erik: We need to say whether
anything happens to the contents when closed.
... is the group relevant or irrelevant?
... For switch a hidden case is not relevant.
Steven: OK, I'll think about that, and submit anew.
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2018Dec/0005
Steven: Initially I was just summarising to restart the discussion, but then I realised there was a simple solution.
Erik: The discussion is about
implicit vs explicit.
... But this is possible; it would work.
... I suggested a special syntax.
... It's nice to be explicit.
... You only have the option of a comment.
... I like using <dispatch/>
Steven: I'll spec it up as-is, and if you can think of a way to make it explicit, yyou can suggest that.
Erik: OK
Steven: All other topics not yet ready for discussion.
[ADJOURN]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.154 of Date: 2018/09/25 16:35:56 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Present: Alain Erik Steven Regrets: Philip No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: Steven Inferring Scribes: Steven Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2018Dec/0003 Found Date: 12 Dec 2018 People with action items: steven WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]