https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2018Nov/0008
Steven: Comments?
Erik: I need to contemplate
more.
... the problem of naming we can figure out.
Steven: That's OK, we can think about it for a week.
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2018Nov/0010
Steven: So Erik, you think @ref is good, but that it should use a single node.
Erik: How we do it, if you point
ot a node X, it has to be an element, and the content of that
element is mirrored into the root element of an instance in the
embedded form.
... Mirroring would be harder if you mirrored more than one
element
... you could imagine using a targetref.
Steven: How do you specify which instance?
Erik: The embedded form has a
special attribute on the mirrored instance
... the simplest thing is to use @ref, pointing to a single
element, the content of which gets mirrored with the content of
the root element of the marked instance (or the first instance
if none is marked).
... another way is to say the element is mirrored as well (with
attributes and name)
... I'm not arguing one way or another
... mirroring the content allows the both forms to be in
control of the name of the element.
Alain: Sounds good to me.
Steven: I'll write text based on this for us to discuss.
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2018Nov/0012
Steven: So you have found a
counter-example
... I'll try and find text that covers all the cases.
... Your example, the setfocus would change the index. The
question that arises for me is if activating an event handler
in a repeat should change the index as well.
Erik: The repeat index is primarily a result of the UI, I don't think event handlers therefore should change the index.
trackbot, close ACTION-2197
<trackbot> Closed ACTION-2197.
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2018Nov/0006
Steven: I don't really have any concrete suggestions, but I'd like it to be easier than it is now. I liked Alain's suggestion of using descendents, but the code is still a bit weird.
Erik: I'd like more time to think about it.
Steven: Sure
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2018Oct/0004
Steven: In progress
identification
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2018Aug/0029
Steven: Reactivated following
Action-2197
... All the other items are in progress.
Steven: A month to the XML Prague deadline.
Erik: Are you going?
Steven: I am.
[ADJOURNED]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.154 of Date: 2018/09/25 16:35:56 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/nide/node/ Succeeded: s/Regrets: none/Regrets: too few to mention/ Present: Alain Erik Philip Steven WARNING: Replacing previous Regrets list. (Old list: Philip) Use 'Regrets+ ... ' if you meant to add people without replacing the list, such as: <dbooth> Regrets+ too, few, to, mention Regrets: too few to mention No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: Steven Inferring Scribes: Steven Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2018Nov/0013 Found Date: 14 Nov 2018 People with action items: WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]