Milestone progress

https://github.com/w3c/html/milestone/24

tink: Deadline is past by 11 days.
... 26% complete.
... Everyone is very busy at the moment, and has little time to work on HTML.
... Given this, and the agreement not to push for CR, and the "holding pattern" we're in until the negotiations are complete
... I wonder whether we should rethink our work mode?

Scott: Yes, that does seem to be the case.

Xiaoqian: We haven't been told not to work on HTML, but also didn't say we had to.
... So we could just focus on fixing the issues we care about, when we have time?
... We could also try making duplicate PRs to the WHATWG.

tink: Patricia, did you want to comment?

<xiaoqian> pati_gallardo?

<pati_gallardo> I was thinking I could work on this : https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/1482

<pati_gallardo> If thats ok?

tink: Patricia, yes, that would be good, thank you.

Scott: I think Xiaoqian's idea makes sense.
... Maybe even go back through what we've done, and propose some pulls back to WHATWG.

tink: I think this is worth doing over the next few weeks.

Xiqoain: Is the AB still discussing this?

tink: No, the F2F was the last time it was on the agenda I believe.

Meeting frequency

tink: Suggestion is that whilst in the holding pattern, we could meet less often, perhaps every two weeks?

Xiaoqian: Yes

Chaals: Sounds like a good idea.

Scott: +1

Spec deltas

https://github.com/whatwg/html/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Apr+closed%3A%3E2018-09-05

Scott: Looking through the commits, I have four that look like we should review.

<Scott_O> https://github.com/whatwg/html/commit/ae94ec51c83fabdde6bafee5443e29bcccd18e10

<Scott_O> https://github.com/whatwg/html/commit/32df557b2e7ca31c495f77f8d47ab4dde1e31490

<Scott_O> https://github.com/whatwg/html/commit/aa374be03beebf25ed33022846c2d03d3ea03484

<Scott_O> https://github.com/whatwg/html/commit/ede3f6161e574b2ea71b090f512d796f0e893a3a

Scott: The first needs review, and I'll take a look.
... The second is a typo, I'll take a look.
... The third is with Chaals.
... The fourth is editorial, and we have the same typo, so I'll PR to fix.

PRs

tink: We have two old PRs aiting.

Scott: One is mine, need to respond to comments from Chaals.

Chaals: The other is mine.
... There is a Bikeshed syntax error and a couple of others.
... Will get it fixed.

Xiaoqian: I think the bikeshed error will go away.

<scribe> scribe: Léonie

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.152  of Date: 2017/02/06 11:04:15  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/Bikeshed error/Bikeshed syntax error and a couple of others/
Succeeded: s/Thanks Chaals, sorry, distracted by an incoming call. Do you want me to finish up?//
Succeeded: s/I can do it if you like//
Present: Scott_O xiaoqian Léonie (tink) chaals
Regrets: Patricia Bruce
No ScribeNick specified.  Guessing ScribeNick: tink
Found Scribe: Léonie

WARNING: No date found!  Assuming today.  (Hint: Specify
the W3C IRC log URL, and the date will be determined from that.)
Or specify the date like this:
<dbooth> Date: 12 Sep 2002

People with action items: 

WARNING: IRC log location not specified!  (You can ignore this 
warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain 
a link to the original IRC log.)